Making an appropriation for the dual and concurrent enrollment program.
Summary
HB 716 is an appropriations bill that directs $3 million in fiscal year 2026 and another $3 million in fiscal year 2027 to the Community College System of New Hampshire. The money is earmarked for scholarships and program support for the state’s dual and concurrent enrollment program under RSA 188-E:26. The bill is effective July 1, 2025, and specifies that the appropriation is in addition to other funds already provided to the community college system.
The appropriation is non-lapsing, meaning any unspent funds at the end of a fiscal year remain available for program use rather than reverting to the general fund. The fiscal note indicates the bill would have a General Fund cost of $3 million in each of FY 2026 and FY 2027, with no expected revenue impact. In practical terms, the bill would expand state support for high school students taking college-level courses through the community college system.
Impact
HB 716 would amend state spending authority by creating a dedicated General Fund appropriation for dual and concurrent enrollment, but it does not change the underlying eligibility or structure of RSA 188-E:26. Its main legal effect is to authorize and protect funding for scholarships and program administration within the Community College System of New Hampshire, while making the appropriation non-lapsing so unused funds can carry forward. The bill primarily affects the state treasury, the community college system, participating school districts, and students who enroll in college courses while still in high school.
Sentiment
Based on the bill text and available context, the overall sentiment appears supportive and straightforward rather than controversial. The bill is framed as a funding measure for an existing educational pathway, suggesting an emphasis on expanding access and strengthening a program that helps students earn college credit early. No committee transcript or recorded votes were provided, so there is no evidence in the available materials of organized opposition or divided sentiment.
Contention
No specific points of contention are documented in the provided materials. Potential areas of debate, if any arise in later consideration, would likely involve the size of the appropriation, the use of General Fund dollars, and whether the program should receive this level of dedicated support relative to other education priorities. However, the available record does not show any named opponents, amendments, or recorded objections.
Relating to workplace heat illness prevention, including the creation of a heat illness prevention advisory board; imposing administrative penalties; providing a private cause of action.