New Hampshire 2022 Regular Session

New Hampshire Senate Bill SB333

Introduced
12/15/21  
Refer
12/15/21  
Report Pass
3/10/22  
Engrossed
3/23/22  
Refer
3/23/22  
Report Pass
4/26/22  

Caption

Relative to licensure of case management service providers and relative to payment by the state of a portion of retirement system contributions of political subdivision employers.

Impact

The implementation of SB 333 is expected to enhance the regulatory framework surrounding home health care and case management services in New Hampshire. It mandates that individuals have the freedom to choose any qualified case management provider, thereby promoting autonomy and individualized care. Additionally, the bill includes provisions to prevent conflicts of interest for case management service providers, ensuring that they do not deliver case management activities and other services to the same individual. This is aimed at mitigating the potential for bias in service provision and ensuring that clients receive candid and impartial support.

Summary

Senate Bill 333 focuses on the licensure of case management service providers, defining them as a specific type of home health care provider under New Hampshire law. The bill amends existing regulations to formally recognize case management services as an entity that assists individuals in accessing necessary medical, social, educational, and other services, particularly for those transitioning to a community setting. Proponents of the bill advocate for the establishment of clear standards for case management services, which they argue is essential for safeguarding the interests of individuals who rely on such services.

Contention

Despite the bill's intended benefits, it has not been without controversy. Opponents may argue that the regulatory burden imposed on service providers could limit their ability to operate effectively or may complicate access to services for individuals in need. There is also concern about how the new definitions and regulations might affect existing providers that may struggle to meet the new licensure requirements. Additionally, the regulation of case management services introduces questions about oversight and accountability, which could provoke further debate among stakeholders in the health and social services sectors.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NH SB20

Relative to payment by the state of a portion of retirement system contributions of political subdivision employers.

NH HB197

Relative to payment by the state of a portion of retirement system contributions of political subdivision employers.

NH HB197

relative to payment by the state of a portion of retirement system contributions of political subdivision employers.

NH HB661

Relative to the department of health and human services management of social security payments, supplemental security income payments, and veterans benefits for children in foster care.

NH HB661

relative to the department of health and human services management of social security payments, supplemental security income payments, and veterans benefits for children in foster care.

NH SB601

relative to the allocation and disbursement of state contributions for non-state employer pension costs under the New Hampshire retirement system.

NH SB133

Relative to the designation of emergency medical services performed by ambulance service providers as essential services.

NH SB611

relative to rate setting parity for Medicaid state plan case management services.

NH HB1043

relative to employer discretion in offering minimum payment options to employees.

NH SB36

relative to the collection and reporting of abortion statistics by health care providers and medical facilities.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.