The attorney general. Providing that the attorney general be elected by a majority vote of the members of the general court in a joint session.
Impact
If CACR24 is adopted, the current system in place, which allows the governor to appoint the attorney general with the consent of the council, will be replaced. The amendment stipulates that the existing attorney general's term will expire one year after the amendment is approved, with future attorneys general serving two-year terms. This change aims to bring more checks and balances to the legislative process and increase the representation of the electorate in the selection of the state’s top legal officer.
Summary
CACR24 proposes a significant change to the way the attorney general of New Hampshire is selected, shifting the appointment process from the governor and executive council to a direct election by a majority vote of the members of the general court in a joint session. This proposed constitutional amendment seeks to enhance the democratic process by making the attorney general directly accountable to the state's legislature rather than being appointed at the discretion of the governor. This change reflects a desire for increased legislative control over the appointment of key state officials.
Sentiment
Discussions surrounding CACR24 have shown a mix of support and opposition. Proponents argue that this amendment would democratize the attorney general's position and ensure that the state's chief legal officer remains accountable to the elected representatives of the people. However, critics express concerns that such a shift may lead to politicization of the office, where the attorney general's decisions could potentially be swayed by legislative pressures rather than guided by legal principles and public interest.
Contention
The key points of contention regarding CACR24 focus on the implications of shifting the appointment process. Detractors worry about the potential for political influence over the attorney general, suggesting that the office could become a tool for political agendas rather than serving its intended purpose as an impartial protector of the law. Supporters, on the other hand, emphasize the necessity of accountability and the need for the attorney general to reflect the will of the people's elected representatives, highlighting an ongoing tension between the ideals of democracy and the practicalities of governance.
AN ACT relating to the administration of government; providing for the election of the attorney general; designating the attorney general as a state elected official; setting the attorney general's term of office; setting the attorney general's salary; providing for filling a vacancy in the position; repealing and modifying provisions for interim appointment; providing for the application of the Ethics and Disclosure Act and other laws to the office of the attorney general and attorney general as a state elected official; amending certain provisions regarding actions the attorney general takes requiring approval of or pursuant to the direction of the governor; prescribing additional duties of the attorney general; making conforming amendments; repealing an obsolete provision; and providing for effective dates.
Relating to selection of an attorney by an indigent parent as attorney ad litem for the parent in certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship.