Nebraska 2025-2026 Regular Session

Nebraska legislature Bill LB347

Introduced
1/16/25  
Refer
1/21/25  

Caption

Eliminate conditions on the issuance of securities by common carriers

Summary

LB347 is a very short bill that would have removed a statutory restriction on the Public Service Commission’s authority over securities issued by common carriers. As introduced, it was framed as an act relating to the Public Service Commission to eliminate conditions on the issuance of securities by common carriers and to outright repeal a specific section of Nebraska Revised Statutes. The bill text itself consists primarily of a repeal provision, indicating that its main purpose was to delete existing law rather than create a new regulatory framework. In practical terms, the bill would have changed state law by striking the section that imposed conditions on common carriers when they sought to issue securities. Common carriers are regulated transportation or utility entities, so the measure would have affected the legal requirements governing their financing and capital-raising activities under Public Service Commission oversight. The bill’s effect would therefore have been to reduce or remove a layer of state regulatory control over those transactions. The available legislative history does not include committee transcripts or recorded floor votes, so there is no direct evidence of debate or public testimony in the materials provided. The bill’s last recorded action indicates that its provisions or portions were amended into LB311 by AM1111 on June 6, 2025, suggesting that LB347 itself did not proceed as a standalone enacted measure. That procedural history implies the policy change was ultimately handled through another bill. Because there are no transcripts or votes, the general sentiment around LB347 cannot be measured from the provided record. However, the bill’s narrow, technical nature and its later incorporation into LB311 suggest it was treated as a targeted regulatory cleanup or policy adjustment rather than a broadly controversial proposal. Any opposition or support would likely have centered on the balance between regulatory oversight and easing financing requirements for regulated carriers. The main point of contention, if any, would have been whether the Public Service Commission should retain conditions on securities issuance by common carriers to protect ratepayers, investors, or the public interest, versus allowing those entities greater flexibility in financing. The bill’s repeal approach indicates a deregulatory direction, which could have been favored by carriers and opposed by those preferring continued commission oversight.

Impact

LB347 would have amended Nebraska law by repealing a statute that conditioned the issuance of securities by common carriers under Public Service Commission oversight. This would have reduced state regulatory requirements for affected carriers, likely making it easier for them to issue securities and raise capital without the repealed statutory conditions. The bill’s provisions were later amended into LB311, so the practical legal change appears to have been carried forward through that measure rather than LB347 standing alone.

Sentiment

No committee transcripts or vote records are provided, so there is no direct evidence of legislative debate or recorded support/opposition in the materials. Based on the bill’s narrow scope and its later incorporation into LB311, the measure appears to have been treated as a technical or targeted regulatory change rather than a high-profile contested issue. The available record suggests a procedural, low-drama handling of the proposal.

Contention

The likely point of contention was the tradeoff between regulatory oversight and flexibility for common carriers. Supporters would favor removing outdated or burdensome conditions on securities issuance, while opponents might argue that the Public Service Commission should keep those conditions to protect the public, investors, or utility customers from risky financing practices. Because no transcripts are available, the specific arguments and sponsors of those positions are not documented in the provided record.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.