A concurrent resolution urging Congress to permit the use of M-44 sodium cyanide devices on any land.
Senate Concurrent Resolution 4012 is a memorializing resolution from the North Dakota Legislative Assembly urging Congress to allow the use of M-44 sodium cyanide devices on any land. The resolution states that these devices are effective for controlling wild animals that prey on livestock and that they are used by USDA Wildlife Services to assist livestock producers and manage predators. It further asserts that, when properly used with warning signs and other precautions, the devices pose no occupational risk to humans.
The resolution does not change North Dakota statutes directly. Instead, it expresses the Legislature’s position to federal lawmakers and asks the Secretary of State to transmit copies to congressional leaders and North Dakota’s congressional delegation. Its practical effect would depend on federal action, not state law, and it is aimed at restoring or expanding federal permission for predator-control use of M-44 devices on public or private lands.
SCR 4012 has no direct effect on North Dakota state law or state regulatory authority; it is a concurrent resolution that serves as a formal request to Congress. If adopted, it would communicate legislative support for federal authorization of M-44 sodium cyanide devices for predator control, potentially influencing federal policy affecting USDA Wildlife Services, livestock producers, and land managers. Any actual change in the legality of M-44 use would require federal action, not state statutory amendment.
The available record shows no committee debate or recorded votes, so there is no documented split in the legislative discussion. Based on the resolution’s language and sponsorship, the measure appears to have been presented in a supportive tone toward predator-control tools and livestock protection. The filing status suggests it advanced at least procedurally, but the absence of transcripts or votes limits the ability to gauge broader sentiment beyond the resolution’s affirmative framing.
The main point of contention is likely the use of M-44 sodium cyanide devices themselves. Supporters, including the resolution’s sponsors, emphasize predator control, livestock protection, and the role of USDA Wildlife Services. Potential opponents would likely focus on human safety, non-target wildlife impacts, and environmental or animal welfare concerns, although those objections are not documented in the provided materials. The resolution also reflects a federal-state tension, because it asks Congress to permit use on any land rather than changing state law directly.