AN ACT to provide a legislative management study relating to the retention of library materials.
Summary
SB 2278 directs the Legislative Management to study whether North Dakota should require certain state-maintained libraries to keep a copy of original versions of books or other written materials when publishers issue revised editions that replace language with wording described as more socially progressive, politically correct, inclusive, or less socially offensive. The study is limited to libraries maintained by state agencies, including the State Library and libraries at institutions under the control of the State Board of Higher Education.
The study must also examine how artificial intelligence affects the retention and alteration of library materials, including whether AI is being used to update or modify texts, and assess the fiscal and operational effects of collection management. The bill does not itself impose a retention mandate; instead, it creates a legislative study and requires a report with findings and any recommended legislation to the 70th Legislative Assembly.
Impact
SB 2278 does not immediately change existing library-retention law, but it opens the door to future policy changes by requiring a formal interim study. Its practical effect is to place state libraries and higher-education libraries under review for possible requirements to preserve original texts alongside updated editions, and to evaluate administrative, budgetary, and technology-related implications before any new mandate is enacted.
Sentiment
The bill appears to have broad legislative support, passing the Senate 44-1 and the House 77-14. That voting pattern suggests general agreement with studying the issue, even if members may differ on the underlying policy concerns. The absence of committee transcript material limits insight into detailed debate, but the strong margins indicate the measure was not highly controversial as a study bill.
Contention
The main point of contention is the policy premise behind the study: whether libraries should be required to retain original versions of works when publishers revise language for inclusivity or social sensitivity. Supporters likely view the issue as one of preservation, transparency, and historical integrity, while opponents may see it as unnecessary, politically charged, or burdensome for libraries. The bill also raises questions about artificial intelligence in editing and collection management, which may concern both preservation advocates and library administrators because of possible costs, workflow impacts, and uncertainty about how AI is being used to alter texts.
An Act Concerning The Curation And Retention Of Literary Materials Contained In Public And School Libraries And Legal Protections Afforded To Librarians And Staff Working In Such Libraries.
Offenders released from the department of corrections and rehabilitation; to provide for a statement of legislative intent; to provide for a legislative management study; and to provide for a legislative management report.