North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Dakota House Bill HB1057

Introduced
1/7/25  
Refer
1/7/25  

Caption

A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact section 15-01-02 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the powers of the board of university and school lands.

Summary

HB 1057 would amend North Dakota Century Code section 15-01-02, which governs the powers of the Board of University and School Lands. The bill restates and organizes the board’s authority over public lands and permanent funds, including lands held for the support of common schools and other state institutions, lands acquired through investment of permanent school funds, and proceeds from sales, gifts, donations, and escheats. It also preserves the board’s authority to invest permanent funds and to manage and dispose of the property under its control. A notable addition in the bill is explicit authority for the board to expend money to make refunds when errors occur involving lands, minerals, funds, proceeds, or other property managed by the board, with refunds paid back from the same fund or account that originally received the money. The bill also expressly authorizes the board to award and distribute energy infrastructure and impact grants from the oil and gas impact grant fund, subject to a cap that annual grants may not exceed 60 percent of the biennial appropriation for those grants. The board could also create an advisory committee to help evaluate grant awards, and it retains authority to adopt necessary policies and rules. The bill’s impact on state law would have been to clarify and expand the statutory description of the board’s administrative powers, especially regarding refunds and the administration of energy infrastructure and impact grants. It would have affected the Board of University and School Lands, the Department of Trust Lands, and recipients or applicants for grants tied to oil and gas impact funding, while leaving the broader framework of state land and fund management intact. Overall sentiment appears negative in the legislative record because the bill failed on House second reading by a vote of 0 yeas to 89 nays. No committee transcript is available, so there is no recorded floor or committee debate to indicate support or opposition arguments, but the unanimous rejection suggests the chamber did not favor the proposal as drafted. Because there are no discussion transcripts, the main point of contention can only be inferred from the bill’s content: lawmakers may have been concerned about the grant authority, the 60 percent annual cap, the creation of an advisory committee, or the need for statutory changes to refund procedures. The bill also touches on management of public lands and permanent funds, areas that can raise scrutiny over fiscal control and administrative discretion.

Impact

HB 1057 would have amended the powers of the Board of University and School Lands in North Dakota by clarifying its authority over public lands, permanent funds, refunds for administrative errors, and energy infrastructure and impact grants. It would have affected the statutes governing state land administration and the oil and gas impact grant fund, while preserving the board’s existing control over school lands, institutional lands, escheats, and related proceeds.

Sentiment

The available voting history indicates strong opposition or lack of support for the bill. It failed on House second reading by a vote of 0-89, and there are no committee transcripts showing affirmative debate or compromise. The absence of recorded discussion suggests the bill did not gain traction in the chamber.

Contention

No formal committee discussion is available, so specific objections are not recorded. Based on the text, likely areas of contention include the board’s authority to distribute energy infrastructure and impact grants, the annual cap tied to the biennial appropriation, the creation of an advisory committee, and the scope of refund authority for errors involving state-managed lands and funds. These issues would primarily concern lawmakers focused on fiscal oversight, administrative discretion, and trust land governance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.