North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Dakota House Bill HB1043

Introduced
1/7/25  
Refer
1/7/25  
Report Pass
1/16/25  
Engrossed
1/20/25  
Refer
2/5/25  
Report Pass
2/21/25  
Enrolled
3/12/25  

Caption

AN ACT to amend and reenact section 61-02-08 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the vice chairman of the state water commission.

Summary

HB 1043 makes a narrow, technical change to North Dakota law governing the State Water Commission. Under current law, the governor serves as chair of the commission, and the commission selects one of its members to serve as vice chair. The bill keeps that structure but clarifies the vice chair’s role in presiding over meetings when the governor and the governor’s appointed representative are absent or disabled. The bill also preserves the existing authority for the chair, or the vice chair in the chair’s absence or disability, to call meetings at any time. In practical terms, HB 1043 is an administrative governance measure that refines meeting procedure and leadership succession for the commission rather than changing water policy, funding, or regulatory authority.

Impact

HB 1043 amends section 61-02-08 of the North Dakota Century Code, which governs meetings and leadership of the State Water Commission. The bill affects how the commission is organized and who presides over meetings, but it does not alter the commission’s substantive powers over water resources, appropriations, or project decisions. Its impact is limited to internal governance and procedural clarity for a state agency.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have received broad support and little opposition. It passed the House unanimously, 89-0, and passed the Senate with only one dissenting vote, 46-1. The vote pattern suggests lawmakers viewed the proposal as a routine housekeeping or clarification bill rather than a controversial policy change.

Contention

There is little evidence of substantive contention in the available record, and no committee transcript excerpts were provided. The only notable point is the single negative vote in the Senate, which may indicate isolated disagreement with the procedural change or with the bill’s necessity, but the record does not explain the reason. Overall, the measure seems to have been treated as a minor administrative update to the State Water Commission’s operating rules.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.