Senate Bill 39 would expand the North Carolina General Statutes Commission from 13 to 14 members by adding one appointment made by the dean of the High Point University School of Law. The bill amends the statute governing the Commission’s membership to reflect this new seat and updates the appointment language so High Point University is included alongside the other law schools and appointing authorities already listed in law.
The measure also makes a conforming change to the appointment schedule, specifying that the High Point University dean’s appointment is made in odd-numbered years, consistent with several other appointing authorities. The bill does not change the Commission’s core duties, only its composition and appointment structure, and it takes effect immediately upon becoming law.
Impact
The bill amends G.S. 164-14, the statute governing the General Statutes Commission, to increase the number of members and formally authorize a new member appointed by the dean of High Point University School of Law. This affects the Commission’s membership balance and appointment process, but it does not alter the Commission’s substantive authority over statutory revision and recommendations. The practical impact is limited to state law administration and the participation of one additional law school in the Commission’s work.
Sentiment
The available context suggests the bill is administrative and likely noncontroversial. It is described as recommended by the General Statutes Commission, and there are no recorded committee transcripts, votes, or objections in the provided materials. The overall tone appears neutral to favorable, with the bill functioning as a routine update to reflect an additional law school representative.
Contention
No specific points of contention are shown in the provided record. If any debate exists, it would most likely concern the expansion of the Commission by one seat and the decision to include High Point University School of Law alongside other North Carolina law schools. However, the materials provided do not show opposition, amendments, or competing views from legislators, stakeholders, or the Commission.