North Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Carolina House Bill HB1058

Caption

House Bill 1058

Summary

House Bill 1058 is a local bill that removes specific parcels of land from the corporate limits of four North Carolina municipalities: the Town of Vass, the Town of Red Oak, the Town of Kernersville, and the Village of Walnut Creek. For each deannexation, the bill identifies the affected property by parcel or tax identification number and sets a June 30, 2026 effective date. It also preserves the ability of the municipalities to collect or foreclose on any preexisting ad valorem tax or special assessment liens as if the property were still inside the town or village limits. In addition to the deannexations, the bill limits the Village of Walnut Creek’s authority to exercise city powers under Chapter 160D of the General Statutes outside its contiguous corporate limits. It repeals a 1977 session law and provides that Walnut Creek’s development regulations and enforcement powers in the affected area remain in place only for the transition period allowed by state law. The bill also ratifies and validates prior real and personal property transactions made by the village before the effective date, even if there had been questions about its authority at the time. The bill’s practical impact is to reduce municipal jurisdiction and tax authority over the listed parcels, shifting those properties out of the affected towns’ and village’s corporate boundaries for future tax years beginning on or after July 1, 2026. It also narrows Walnut Creek’s extraterritorial or beyond-boundary regulatory reach, which may affect zoning, development regulation, and enforcement in areas outside the village’s contiguous limits. Existing municipal liens remain enforceable, so the bill does not erase prior tax or assessment obligations. The available legislative context suggests the bill moved as a routine local measure, with no recorded committee transcript or roll-call vote showing controversy. The absence of recorded opposition, combined with the committee substitute favorable report, indicates generally neutral or favorable sentiment toward the bill. Because the bill affects specific parcels and one municipality’s regulatory powers, any contention would likely center on local land-use authority, municipal tax base loss, or the fairness of removing particular properties from city limits, but no explicit objections are provided in the record. Overall, HB1058 appears to be a targeted local government and land-use bill focused on deannexation, municipal boundary adjustments, and clarification of municipal authority, especially for the Village of Walnut Creek.

Impact

HB1058 amends the municipal boundaries of four local governments by removing specified parcels from the Town of Vass, Town of Red Oak, Town of Kernersville, and Village of Walnut Creek. It also limits Walnut Creek’s authority to exercise Chapter 160D city powers beyond its contiguous corporate limits, while preserving the validity of prior property transactions and the enforceability of existing municipal liens. The bill reduces future municipal tax liability for the affected parcels and may affect local zoning, development regulation, and enforcement in the Walnut Creek area.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have been treated as a local, administrative measure rather than a controversial policy proposal. The available record shows a committee substitute favorable action and no recorded votes or transcripts indicating opposition. Overall sentiment is best characterized as neutral to favorable, with no documented public disagreement in the materials provided.

Contention

No specific contention is documented in the provided legislative record. Potential points of concern, based on the bill’s substance, would be the loss of municipal tax base for the affected towns and village, the removal of properties from local jurisdiction, and the restriction of the Village of Walnut Creek’s extraterritorial development powers. Any disagreement would likely come from affected municipalities, property owners, or local land-use interests, but none are identified in the available materials.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NC HB26

House Bill 26 / SL 2025-14

NC HB1068

House Bill 1068

NC HB338

House Bill 338

NC S811

Various Local Provisions VIII

NC HB147

House Bill 147

NC HB1018

House Bill 1018

NC HB336

House Bill 336

NC S214

Various Local Provisions VII

NC HB63

House Bill 63

NC HB1056

House Bill 1056

Similar Bills

CA SB1352

Property taxation: newly constructed: reconstructed property.

CA AB245

Property taxation: application of base year value: disaster relief.

CA SB1053

Property taxation: transfer of base year value: disaster relief.

CA SB603

An act to amend Section 69 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, relating to taxation, to take effect immediately, tax levy.

HI HB1398

Relating To Property.

HI HB1398

Relating To Property.

TX HB2011

Relating to the right to repurchase from a condemning entity certain real property for which ad valorem taxes are delinquent.