House Bill 757 appropriates $31,000 in nonrecurring General Fund money for fiscal year 2025-2026 to the Office of State Budget and Management for a directed grant to Joyful Soul Treasures, Inc., a nonprofit organization. The grant is intended to support the organization’s “Safe Haven for Safe Sex” project, a campaign focused on sexual health education and awareness for adolescents ages 13 through 18.
The bill is a targeted appropriations measure rather than a broad policy change. It does not create a new statewide program or amend existing public health statutes; instead, it directs state funds to a named nonprofit for a specific outreach and education initiative. The act would take effect July 1, 2025, if enacted.
Impact
The bill would authorize a one-time, nonrecurring appropriation from the General Fund and route the money through the Office of State Budget and Management as a directed grant to Joyful Soul Treasures, Inc. Its practical effect would be to support a nonprofit-led sexual health education campaign for teenagers, potentially expanding access to information on sexual health, stigma reduction, and awareness in the targeted age group. It would not directly alter the text of state health, education, or nonprofit law, but it would use state appropriations authority to fund a specific community-based program.
Sentiment
Based on the bill text and the absence of recorded committee debate or votes in the provided materials, the bill appears to be presented in a straightforward, supportive manner as a modest public-health and youth-education appropriation. The framing emphasizes education, awareness, and reducing misconceptions, suggesting a generally positive intent around adolescent health outreach. No recorded opposition or amendment activity is available in the provided context.
Contention
The main potential points of contention are likely to center on the use of state funds for a directed grant to a single nonprofit and the subject matter of sexual health education for minors. Supporters would likely view the project as a preventive health and education effort for adolescents, while critics could question whether the state should fund a named private organization or whether the program’s content and approach are appropriate for the target age group. No specific objections, supporters, or committee concerns are documented in the provided transcript or vote history.