North Carolina 2023-2024 Regular Session

North Carolina Senate Bill S367

Introduced
3/23/23  

Caption

Intercept Communications/All Parties Consent

Impact

If enacted, SB 367 would amend existing laws related to the interception of communications, making it a Class H felony to intercept communications without the consent of all parties involved. This change is significant, as it would provide a stronger legal framework to protect the privacy of individuals and deter unauthorized interception activities. The bill is slated to take effect on December 1, 2023, and would apply to offenses committed on or after that date, indicating a proactive approach towards addressing privacy concerns moving forward.

Summary

Senate Bill 367 aims to prohibit the interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications without the consent of all parties involved. This bill seeks to enhance privacy protections for individuals by ensuring that communication cannot be monitored or disclosed without consent. The legislation aligns with a growing concern about the rights of individuals to maintain confidentiality in their communications, particularly in an age where technology allows for easy interception and monitoring of conversations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 367 appears largely supportive among privacy advocates who view it as a necessary step to bolster individual rights. Legislators sponsoring the bill promote it as a way to enhance legal safeguards against unauthorized monitoring. However, concerns have been raised about how this legislation may affect law enforcement's ability to conduct investigations, as the requirement for all-party consent could complicate certain operational procedures, potentially leading to a debate on balancing privacy rights with public safety needs.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential implications for law enforcement agencies and their communication interception methods. Critics may argue that requiring consent from all parties could hinder investigations into criminal activities, where timely interception of communications is crucial. Additionally, the classification of violations under the proposed law and its implications for various sectors, including emergency services and public safety communication systems, are expected to be scrutinized during discussions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NC SB38

Intercepted Communications - Penalty

NC SB680

Intercepted Communications - Penalty

NC HB688

Intercepted Communications - Penalty

NC HB0688

Intercepted Communications - Penalty

NC HB130

Intercepted Communications - Statute of Limitations and Penalty

NC HB706

Intercepted Communications - Statute of Limitations and Penalties

NC SB661

Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance - Intercepted Communications - Admissibility of Evidence

NC SB61

Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance - Authorized Interception of Oral Communications - Cellular Telephones and Security Cameras

NC H3593

Wiretapping, all parties

NC H3594

Wiretapping, all parties

Similar Bills

CA AB2204

Prisons: organized sports programming.

AZ HB2307

Technical correction; emergency interception

HI SB284

Relating To Interception Of Wire, Oral, Or Electronic Communication.

NV AB275

Revises provisions related to criminal procedure. (BDR 14-548)

AL HB137

ALEA; wiretapping; interpreters authorized; extend law indefinitely

NJ S1508

Makes it unlawful to record telephone call or other conversation unless all parties consent.

NJ A1211

Makes it unlawful to record telephone call or other conversation unless all parties consent.

FL H0539

Code Inspector Body Cameras