Confirm the governor's appointee for the board of dentistry
Summary
SR 107 is a Senate resolution that confirms the Governor’s appointment of Julie Strong of Butte to the Montana Board of Dentistry. The resolution states that the Senate concurs in, confirms, and consents to the appointment made under Montana law, with the term ending July 1, 2028. It is a personnel/appointment measure rather than a policy bill, and its sole operative effect is to approve the named appointee for service on the board.
The resolution does not change substantive dental or health-care law. Instead, it carries out the Senate’s constitutional and statutory role in advising and consenting to certain gubernatorial appointments, specifically under sections 5-5-302 and 5-5-303, MCA, and the board’s governing statute, section 2-15-1732, MCA. Once adopted, the Secretary of the Senate is directed to transmit the resolution to the Secretary of State and the Governor, completing the confirmation process.
Impact
SR 107 affects the composition of the Montana Board of Dentistry by confirming one member appointed by the Governor. It does not amend licensing rules, disciplinary standards, or other regulatory provisions, but it does ensure the board can continue operating with a confirmed member in place. The bill’s legal impact is limited to the appointment and confirmation process under Montana statutes governing executive appointments and legislative consent.
Sentiment
The sentiment around SR 107 appears strongly favorable and noncontroversial. The resolution passed the Senate Public Health, Welfare and Safety Committee 11-0 and then passed the full Senate 49-0, indicating unanimous support among voting members. The absence of committee discussion or recorded opposition suggests the appointment was routine and broadly accepted.
Contention
There is no notable substantive contention reflected in the available record. Because SR 107 is a confirmation resolution, any disagreement would likely have centered on the qualifications or suitability of the appointee, but no such concerns appear in the transcripts or votes. The unanimous committee and floor votes indicate that the appointment was not politically divisive and did not raise issues about the Board of Dentistry’s authority or mission.