Montana 2025 Regular Session

Montana House Bill HB460

Introduced
2/12/25  
Refer
2/12/25  

Caption

Amending the constitution to provide for electors of a county to call a grand jury

Summary

HB 460 is a proposed constitutional amendment that would change Montana’s grand jury process by allowing county electors to trigger a grand jury through petition. Under the bill, if a petition is signed by 100 plus one-half of 1% of a county’s registered electors and submitted to the county election administrator, the district judge would be required to summon and impanel a grand jury. The measure is framed as expanding citizen access to grand juries and reducing the exclusive control of district judges over whether a grand jury is convened. The bill also expands what a petition-called grand jury could do after it is impaneled. It would require the county attorney to prosecute indictments returned by that grand jury, allow the grand jury to seek assistance from the attorney general or retain a private prosecutor if necessary, and authorize the grand jury to seek court orders and hire independent counsel. The proposal would amend Article II, section 20 of the Montana Constitution, so it would not change ordinary statutes directly; instead, it would alter the constitutional framework governing criminal prosecution and grand jury authority if approved by voters in 2026.

Impact

If adopted, HB 460 would materially change Montana constitutional law by creating a new elector-initiated pathway for convening a grand jury in any county. It would limit current judicial discretion over impaneling grand juries and impose new duties on county attorneys, with potential exposure for failure to prosecute grand jury indictments. It would also authorize use of the attorney general or private prosecutors and permit grand juries to act more independently in seeking remedies and counsel, affecting county government, prosecutors, courts, and criminal procedure statewide.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have had mixed but meaningful support, with enough backing to pass the House Judiciary Committee 11-9, but not enough to advance on the House floor. The floor votes show significant division: an amendment failed 49-49, and the bill itself failed 40-59 on second reading. The overall sentiment suggests interest among supporters in expanding citizen power over grand juries, but insufficient consensus in the full House to move the proposal forward.

Contention

The main point of contention is the bill’s shift of grand jury initiation power from district judges to county electors, which opponents likely viewed as a major change to judicial and prosecutorial discretion. Another disputed issue is the bill’s requirement that county attorneys prosecute indictments and its threat of indictment for noncompliance, along with the possibility of compelling the attorney general or hiring private prosecutors at county expense. Supporters emphasized citizen oversight and access to grand juries, while opponents appeared concerned about separation of powers, prosecutorial independence, and the practical consequences of mandating grand jury action through petition.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MT SB185

Constitutional amendment regarding qualified elector to require that only a citizen can vote

MT SC513

Constitution; amend Section 26 to expand the jurisdiction of the state grand jury.

MT SC502

Constitution; amend Section 26 to expand the jurisdiction of the state grand jury.

MT SB1888

Relating to reconstitution of the petit jury wheel and grand juror and petit juror qualifications in certain counties.

MT HB4749

Relating to reconstitution of the petit jury wheel and grand juror and petit juror qualifications and juror summoning in certain counties.

MT HB2637

Relating to the practice and procedures for summoning prospective grand jurors and petit jurors and the exemption of certain persons from grand jury and petit jury service.

MT SR4

Senate resolution to support United States constitutional amendment for campaign finance limits

MT ACR83

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment to provide for State constitutional convention to reduce government spending and to reform system of property taxation.

MT HB316

Constitutional amendment to define person

MT HB586

Provides for calling a constitutional convention (EG INCREASE GF EX See Note)

Similar Bills

LA HB472

(Constitutional Amendment) Revises Article VII of the Constitution of La. (OR -$139,000,000 GF RV See Note)

NJ ACR123

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

NJ SCR75

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

NJ SCR43

Proposes constitutional amendment authorizing Legislature to invalidate certain court decisions.

LA HB244

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides for the election of constitutional convention delegates and vote requirements necessary for the adoption of a new constitution (RR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

LA HB678

(Constitutional Amendment) Modifies disposition of certain state revenues through repeal of the Revenue Stabilization Trust Fund and deposits of certain revenue streams into the Budget Stabilization Fund (RRF INCREASE GF RV See Note)

LA HB473

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to the application of state monies to the unfunded accrued liability of the Teachers' Retirement System of La. (EN DECREASE SD RV See Note)

HI SB1225

Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.