Revise laws related to voting system testing and certification
Impact
The measure impacts existing statutes concerning the testing requirements for voting systems by mandating that, before a voting system can be used in an election, it must undergo a hash validation test. This test will compare the system's hash value to a trusted hash established at the time of its initial certification. If discrepancies are found, the voting system cannot be utilized in upcoming elections. Furthermore, the Secretary of State is tasked with ensuring that at least 10% of each type of voting system in Montana is subjected to random testing annually.
Summary
SB482, introduced by C. Glimm and requested by the Joint Select Committee on Election Security, seeks to amend various laws regarding the testing and certification of voting systems in Montana. The primary focus is on requiring hash validation tests for all voting machines used in the state. This measure is aimed at ensuring the integrity of voting systems by verifying that their software and firmware have not been altered since certification. The bill introduces definitions for 'hash', 'hash validation test', and 'trusted hash', solidifying the processes involved in maintaining election security.
Contention
SB482 has sparked discussions regarding its implications for election administration. Proponents assert that these measures are crucial for safeguarding the electoral process against potential tampering or inaccuracies in vote counting. Conversely, some critics express concerns about the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of implementing such rigorous testing protocols, particularly for smaller jurisdictions with limited resources. They argue that while election security is paramount, the practicality of enforcing these mandates needs careful consideration to avoid unintended consequences on local elections.
In electronic voting systems, further providing for definitions and for supplies and preparation of the voting system and of polling places and providing for pre-election logic and accuracy testing.
In electronic voting systems, further providing for definitions and for supplies and preparation of the voting system and of polling places and providing for pre-election logic and accuracy testing; and, in penalties, providing for falsification of election-related documentation regarding pre-election logic and accuracy testing.