AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LAMAR COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, TO EMPLOY THE PART-TIME COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY AS A FULL-TIME ELECTED OFFICIAL DURING HIS OR HER TERM OF OFFICE AND TO PRESCRIBE THE COMPENSATION FOR SUCH ATTORNEY; AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES.
Summary
SB 2928 is a local and private bill affecting Lamar County, Mississippi. It gives the Lamar County Board of Supervisors discretion to convert the county prosecuting attorney from a part-time position to a full-time elected official during the attorney’s term of office.
The bill also sets the compensation for that position. If the board chooses to make the role full-time, the attorney would receive additional compensation equal to 90% of the annual salary of the Lamar County and Youth Court Judge. The bill states that this salary arrangement, together with the compensation already authorized under Section 25-3-9 of the Mississippi Code, would be the sole and complete salary paid by Lamar County for the prosecuting attorney, overriding any conflicting law.
Impact
SB 2928 would create a county-specific exception to general law by authorizing Lamar County to employ its county prosecuting attorney as a full-time elected official and by prescribing a special compensation structure for that office. It directly affects local government staffing and county payroll obligations, and it references Section 25-3-9 of the Mississippi Code as part of the salary framework. The bill does not appear to change statewide prosecuting attorney law generally, but instead grants Lamar County a tailored authority and compensation rule.
Sentiment
No committee transcripts or recorded votes were provided, so there is no direct evidence of debate, support, or opposition. Based on the bill text alone, the measure appears administrative and local in nature, with a straightforward purpose of adjusting the staffing and pay structure for one county office. The absence of recorded controversy suggests the bill may be routine, though that cannot be confirmed from the available materials.
Contention
The main potential point of contention is fiscal: Lamar County would be authorizing a higher compensation package tied to the salary of the Lamar County and Youth Court Judge, which could raise concerns about county spending or pay equity. Another possible issue is governance, since the bill allows the board of supervisors discretion to change the prosecuting attorney’s status during the term of office, which may prompt questions about timing, local control, and the relationship between elected office and employment status. No specific objections or supporters are documented in the provided context.