AN ACT TO AMEND SECTION 73-27-1, MISSISSIPPI CODE OF 1972, TO PROVIDE THAT A LICENSED PODIATRIST MAY PERFORM SURGICAL TREATMENT OF THE ANKLE AND GOVERNING STRUCTURES AND TISSUE WHEN THE PODIATRIST HAS MET CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS; TO PROVIDE THAT A LICENSED PODIATRIST MAY PERFORM ANKLE SURGERY ONLY IN AN ACCREDITED HOSPITAL LICENSED IN THE STATE; TO SET CERTAIN LIMITATIONS ON THE PROCEDURES THAT A PODIATRIST MAY PERFORM; AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES.
Summary
Senate Bill 2199 amends Mississippi’s podiatry law to expand the scope of practice for properly qualified podiatrists. Under the bill, a licensed podiatrist may perform surgical treatment of the ankle and the surrounding structures and tissue, but only if the podiatrist has completed an approved postgraduate surgical residency of at least 24 months and is certified by the American Board of Foot and Ankle Surgery in reconstructive rearfoot and ankle surgery. The bill also ties this authority to specific training and certification standards, rather than allowing ankle surgery for all licensed podiatrists.
The bill further limits where and how ankle surgery may be performed. Ankle surgery would be allowed only in an accredited hospital licensed in Mississippi, defined as an acute care hospital with surgical services available, and only where the podiatrist has been granted surgical privileges by that facility’s medical staff. The procedures permitted are also narrowed to those listed in CPME 320, or its successors, as required for graduation and certification in reconstructive rearfoot and ankle surgery. The act would take effect July 1, 2026.
Impact
SB2199 would amend Section 73-27-1 of the Mississippi Code, which defines podiatric medicine and the authority of podiatrists to prescribe, administer, and perform procedures. The bill expands the statutory scope of practice by expressly authorizing certain podiatrists to perform ankle surgery, while preserving existing limits on anesthesia and maintaining the general focus of podiatric practice on the foot. It also creates facility-based and credential-based restrictions that affect hospitals, podiatrists, and medical staff privileging processes, and it may influence how Mississippi regulates surgical scope-of-practice boundaries between podiatrists and other surgical providers.
Sentiment
Based on the bill text and the absence of recorded committee debate or votes in the provided materials, the overall sentiment appears procedural and supportive of a narrowly tailored scope-of-practice expansion. The bill is framed as a professional licensing measure with detailed safeguards, suggesting an intent to balance expanded access to care with patient safety and credentialing standards. No contrary positions are documented in the provided context.
Contention
The main points of potential contention are the expansion of podiatrists’ authority into ankle surgery and the standards required to do so. Supporters would likely emphasize that only highly trained, board-certified podiatrists may perform these procedures and only in licensed acute care hospitals with surgical privileges. Opponents or skeptics could focus on whether ankle surgery should remain outside podiatric practice, whether the residency and certification requirements are sufficient, and whether the bill could blur lines between podiatric and orthopedic surgical practice. The hospital-privileges requirement and the CPME 320 procedure limitation are likely intended to address those concerns.
Investigative reports; exempt youth court reports from the Mississippi Public Records Act, bring forward provisions related to.Commission on Judicial Performance.