Mississippi 2026 Regular Session

Mississippi House Bill HB1389

Introduced
1/16/26  
Refer
1/16/26  

Caption

AN ACT TO PROVIDE FOR THE LICENSURE AND REGULATION OF PROFESSIONAL MIDWIFERY; TO PROVIDE DEFINITIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE ACT; TO PROVIDE EXCEPTIONS TO THE APPLICABILITY OF THE ACT; TO PROVIDE THE SCOPE OF PRACTICE FOR LICENSED MIDWIVES; TO PROVIDE MANDATORY PROCEDURES FOR LICENSED MIDWIVES; TO PROHIBIT LICENSED MIDWIVES FROM CERTAIN ACTIONS; TO PROVIDE THAT THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SHALL ADMINISTER LICENSURE AND REGULATION OF LICENSED MIDWIVES UNDER RULES PROMULGATED BY THE STATE BOARD OF HEALTH AND TO PROVIDE POWERS AND DUTIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION; TO REQUIRE THE STATE BOARD OF HEALTH TO PROMULGATE RULES NOT LATER THAN JULY 1, 2027; TO REQUIRE A LICENSE ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT TO PRACTICE PROFESSIONAL MIDWIFERY; TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF TEMPORARY PERMITS TO PRACTICE PENDING QUALIFICATION FOR LICENSURE; TO PROVIDE EXEMPTIONS FROM LICENSURE FOR CERTAIN PERSONS; TO PROVIDE FOR THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION MAINTAINED BY THE DEPARTMENT; TO PROVIDE IMMUNITY FOR CERTAIN ACTIONS; TO PROVIDE PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THIS ACT; TO PROHIBIT TERMINOLOGY IN ANY HEALTH COVERAGE PLAN, POLICY OR CONTRACT THAT IS DISCRIMINATORY AGAINST PROFESSIONAL MIDWIFERY; TO REQUIRE HEALTH COVERAGE PLANS THAT PROVIDE MATERNITY BENEFITS TO PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR SERVICES RENDERED BY A LICENSED MIDWIFE; TO PROVIDE WHENEVER A HEALTH COVERAGE PLAN PROVIDES FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ANY SERVICES THAT ARE WITHIN THE LAWFUL SCOPE OF PRACTICE OF LICENSED MIDWIVES, THE PERSON ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE PLAN SHALL BE ENTITLED TO REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE SERVICES, WHETHER THE SERVICES ARE PERFORMED BY A PHYSICIAN OR A LICENSED MIDWIFE; TO REQUIRE THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH TO DEVELOP AND INSTITUTE A SAFE PERINATAL TRANSFER CERTIFICATION FOR THE FACILITIES THAT IT REGULATES; TO AMEND SECTION 73-25-33, MISSISSIPPI CODE OF 1972, TO CLARIFY THAT THE PRACTICE OF MIDWIFERY IS NOT CONSIDERED TO BE THE PRACTICE OF MEDICINE; AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES.

Impact

The bill seeks to address significant public health concerns in Mississippi, including high rates of preterm births and maternal mortality. By enabling community-based midwives to operate under a legal framework, the legislation is designed to expand access to maternity care options for families seeking alternatives to hospital births. This is expected to improve health outcomes and increase public confidence in midwifery services, which have traditionally played a vital role in maternal healthcare.

Summary

House Bill 1389, known as the Mississippi Midwifery License Law, proposes the establishment of a regulatory framework for professional midwifery, including the licensure of midwives and the creation of a Midwifery Advisory Council. The bill emphasizes the importance of patient-centered care that takes into account the emotional, social, and spiritual dimensions of pregnancy and childbirth. By providing a system for midwives to become licensed, the bill aims to enhance the competency and accountability of midwifery practices across the state, ultimately benefiting maternal and infant health outcomes.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB1389 appears to be supportive, particularly among advocates for maternal health and midwifery professionals. Supporters argue that proper regulation would not only ensure safety and high standards in midwifery practices but also empower families by providing them with more choices regarding childbirth. However, there may also be concerns about how such regulations could be enforced and whether they might inadvertently restrict access to care for certain populations.

Contention

Some points of contention in the discussions around HB1389 may include the balance between regulation and access to care. Critics may express concerns that licensing requirements could create barriers for experienced midwives who operate outside traditional healthcare systems, particularly in rural areas. Additionally, legislation specifics concerning temporary permits and exemptions for certain types of care might also spark debate, especially regarding the extent to which traditional birth practices are recognized under this new legal framework.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.