Mississippi 2026 Regular Session

Mississippi House Bill HB1000

Introduced
1/16/26  
Refer
1/16/26  

Caption

AN ACT TO ESTABLISH THE MISSISSIPPI PAID FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT; TO PROVIDE CERTAIN APPLICABLE DEFINITIONS; TO REQUIRE THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY TO ESTABLISH AND ADMINISTER A FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE INSURANCE PROGRAM; TO PROVIDE COVERED INDIVIDUALS WITH THE RIGHT TO PAID FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE; TO DETERMINE THE AMOUNT OF FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE INSURANCE BENEFITS FOR COVERED INDIVIDUALS; TO CREATE THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE INSURANCE FUND IN THE STATE TREASURY; TO PROVIDE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF INSURANCE PREMIUMS BY THE STATE TREASURER; TO PROTECT THE EMPLOYMENT OF COVERED INDIVIDUALS WHILE THEY ARE ON LEAVE; TO PROHIBIT EMPLOYERS FROM VIOLATING RIGHTS PROTECTED IN THIS ACT; TO REQUIRE THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT TO HOLD VIOLATING EMPLOYERS LIABLE; TO PROVIDE THAT THIS ACT IS TO BE CONSTRUED ALONGSIDE SIMILAR PROVISIONS IN THE FEDERAL FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT; TO REQUIRE THAT CLAIMS BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULES PRESCRIBED BY THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT; TO DISQUALIFY COVERED INDIVIDUALS FROM COVERAGE FOR FRAUD, MISREPRESENTATION, OR ERRONEOUS PAYMENT; TO ALLOW COVERED INDIVIDUALS TO ELECT FOR INITIAL COVERAGE OR SUBSEQUENT COVERAGE; TO PRESCRIBE CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FORMATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE INSURANCE PROGRAM; TO REQUIRE CERTAIN ACTIONS BY THE DEPARTMENT IF THE INSURANCE BENEFITS IN THIS ACT ARE SUBJECT TO FEDERAL INCOME TAX; TO ALLOW FOR INTERMITTENT OR REDUCED LEAVE; TO REQUIRE THE DEPARTMENT TO MAKE AN ANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE; TO REQUIRE THE DEPARTMENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC EDUCATION CAMPAIGN ABOUT THE PROGRAM; TO ENCOURAGE THE DEPARTMENT TO COLLECT DATA FOR THE PURPOSE OF LIMITING THE COST OF THE PROGRAM; TO REQUIRE EMPLOYERS TO PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTICE OF THE PROGRAM TO EMPLOYEES UPON HIRING AND ANNUALLY THEREAFTER; TO AMEND SECTION 25-3-105, MISSISSIPPI CODE OF 1972, TO CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ACT; TO BRING FORWARD SECTIONS 25-3-91, 25-3-92, 25-3-93 AND 25-3-95, MISSISSIPPI CODE OF 1972, WHICH PROVIDE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, PERSONAL AND MAJOR MEDICAL LEAVE FOR STATE EMPLOYEES, FOR THE PURPOSE OF POSSIBLE AMENDMENT; AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES.

Impact

By formalizing the right to paid family and medical leave, HB1000 represents a significant shift in Mississippi's employment laws, particularly aiming to provide better support for families during critical times. The act is designed to protect the employment rights of covered individuals, ensuring they can return to their jobs post-leave without discrimination or retaliation. Furthermore, it establishes a funding mechanism, the Family and Medical Leave Insurance Fund, which will be financed through employee premiums determined by the state treasurer, ultimately fostering a more equitable work environment for those balancing employment and family responsibilities.

Summary

House Bill 1000 establishes the Mississippi Paid Family and Medical Leave Act, which aims to implement a structured program providing paid family and medical leave to covered individuals within the state. This act requires the Mississippi Department of Employment Security to create and manage a Family and Medical Leave Insurance Program, which would administer benefits for employees needing time off for significant life events such as childbirth, adoption, or caring for a family member with a serious health condition. Starting January 1, 2029, eligible individuals can receive these benefits under specific criteria that address various leave situations.

Contention

Notably, there may be points of contention surrounding the act related to its funding model and potential costs to employers and employees. Some critics may argue that while the initiative promotes essential family rights, the financial burden of financing the program could disproportionately affect small businesses and lead to unintended economic consequences. Additionally, the parameters designed to prevent fraudulent claims could create challenges for employees seeking legitimate benefits. Balancing the goals of the act with practical implications for the workforce will likely prompt ongoing discussions among stakeholders as the bill evolves.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.