Mississippi 2025 Regular Session

Mississippi Senate Bill SB2982

Introduced
2/12/25  
Refer
2/12/25  

Caption

General Fund; FY2026 appropriation to Town of Pickens for certain infrastructure projects.

Summary

SB 2982 is a fiscal year 2026 appropriation bill that provides $760,000 from the Mississippi State General Fund to the Town of Pickens for specified local infrastructure projects. The money is divided among four purposes: $300,000 for resurfacing and repairing roadways and sewer pipes in the Union Street area, $300,000 for new water pumps and water system improvements including the booster station on State Highway 17, $60,000 for renovating and improving the old city hall on Yazoo Street, and $100,000 for renovating, repairing, improving, and equipping a city park. The bill is effective July 1, 2025, and authorizes the State Treasurer and State Fiscal Officer to disburse the funds under the usual state warrant and requisition process. It does not create a new regulatory program or change general law; instead, it is a one-time, locality-specific appropriation directing state funds to named municipal projects in Pickens, Mississippi.

Impact

SB 2982 would temporarily affect state finances by appropriating $760,000 from the General Fund for a single municipality, but it does not amend the Mississippi Code or impose ongoing obligations on other governments or private parties. Its practical impact is to support local public works, utility infrastructure, municipal building repairs, and park improvements in Pickens, with spending limited to the listed projects during FY2026.

Sentiment

The available context suggests the bill is straightforward and likely noncontroversial, as it is a targeted appropriations measure with no recorded committee debate or votes in the provided materials. The caption and text indicate a routine local infrastructure funding request, and there is no evidence of opposition or amendment activity in the record supplied.

Contention

No specific points of contention are shown in the provided transcripts or vote history, because none were included. If any concerns were raised, they would most likely relate to the use of state General Fund dollars for a single town, the prioritization of local projects, or the allocation among road, sewer, water, city hall, and park improvements, but the record provided does not show any expressed disagreement.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.