Mississippi 2025 Regular Session

Mississippi Senate Bill SB2758

Introduced
1/20/25  
Refer
1/20/25  

Caption

Cultivated food products; criminalize the manufacture, sale or distribution of.

Summary

Senate Bill 2758 would prohibit the manufacture, sale, offering for sale, holding for sale, or distribution of “cultivated food products” in Mississippi, defined as food products produced from cultured animal cells. In practical terms, the bill targets lab-grown or cell-cultured meat and similar products, making their commercial presence unlawful in the state beginning July 1, 2025. The bill creates criminal and regulatory consequences for violations. Any person who violates the prohibition would commit a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $500, up to three months in county jail, or both. It also ties violations by retail food establishments to existing licensing and permitting enforcement under state agriculture and health laws, allowing the Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce and the State Department of Health to suspend or revoke licenses or permits and to adopt rules needed to implement the ban.

Impact

SB2758 would add a new statewide prohibition on cultivated or cell-cultured food products and would effectively bar their commercial manufacture and sale in Mississippi. It would also expand enforcement authority for the Department of Agriculture and Commerce and the State Department of Health by linking violations to retail food establishment discipline, including possible suspension or revocation of licenses and permits under Section 69-1-18 and related health regulations.

Sentiment

Based on the bill text and the absence of recorded committee debate or votes in the provided materials, the available record shows no documented opposition or support statements to gauge legislative sentiment. The bill’s sponsors and caption indicate a clear intent to restrict cultivated food products, suggesting a precautionary or prohibitive policy approach, but the provided context does not include floor or committee discussion reflecting broader sentiment.

Contention

The main point of contention is likely the policy choice to ban cultivated food products altogether rather than regulate them, which would affect emerging food technology, alternative protein producers, and retailers that might sell such products. Another likely issue is the use of criminal penalties and licensing sanctions against retail food establishments, since the bill extends enforcement beyond manufacturers to sellers and distributors and authorizes both agriculture and health agencies to implement the ban through rulemaking.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MS SB2001

Economic development; provide incentives for certain economic development projects.

MS HB1

Economic development; provide incentives for certain economic development projects.

MS HB2

Appropriation; additional to MDA for certain projects.

MS SB2002

Appropriation; additional to MDA for certain projects.

MS HB1

Project Atlas Fund; create.

MS SB2001

Project Poppy Fund; create.

Similar Bills

NV AB308

Revises provisions relating to cannabis establishment agents. (BDR 56-822)

IL SB4042

VIDEO GAMING-VARIOUS

IL HB3729

VIDEO GAMING-VARIOUS

NH HB1469

(New Title) relative to the licensing requirements for massage therapy establishments.

IL HB3135

VIDEO GAMING-LICENSEE LOCATION

NV AB116

Revises provisions relating to food delivery service platform providers. (BDR 52-898)

IN HB1577

Mobile retail food establishment licenses.

CA SB1363

Barbering and cosmetology.