Mississippi 2025 Regular Session

Mississippi Senate Bill SB2730

Introduced
1/20/25  
Refer
1/20/25  
Engrossed
2/11/25  
Refer
2/14/25  
Enrolled
4/7/25  

Caption

Mississippi Burn Care Fund; provide that SBH shall equitably divide funds among all certified health centers.

Summary

SB 2730 amends Mississippi law governing emergency medical services and burn care funding. The bill directs the State Board of Health to equitably divide appropriated money from the Mississippi Burn Care Fund among all certified health centers while the Mississippi Burn Center at the University of Mississippi Medical Center is not yet operational. It also makes conforming changes to the statute that creates and governs the Burn Care Fund, which is used to support burn treatment services and related expenses for Mississippi residents. The bill leaves in place the broader framework under Section 41-59-5 for EMS, trauma care, and burn victim services, but clarifies how burn care dollars are to be distributed. Under the amended language, the Board of Health must continue to manage burn care planning, patient transfer systems, and reimbursement for travel, lodging, meals, and other reasonable expenses for burn victims, family members, and caregivers. Once the state burn center becomes operational, the plan is to be revised to include that center, and appropriations from the fund would then go to the University of Mississippi Medical Center for operation of the burn center. In practical terms, the bill affects the State Board of Health, certified health centers that treat burn patients, and the University of Mississippi Medical Center. It changes the distribution rule for Burn Care Fund appropriations by requiring an equitable division among all certified health centers, rather than leaving allocation more narrowly directed. The bill also preserves the existing statutory structure that ties burn care funding to the statewide trauma and EMS system. The overall sentiment around the bill appears strongly supportive and noncontroversial. It passed the Senate 51-0, the House 119-0, and both chambers later adopted the conference report unanimously, indicating broad bipartisan agreement. No committee transcript or recorded debate was provided, and the voting history suggests little to no opposition. The main point of potential contention, based on the text, is the allocation of limited burn care funds among certified health centers versus a more centralized or targeted distribution model. The bill’s language favors an equitable statewide distribution before the burn center is operational, which could matter to hospitals and health centers that treat burn patients. However, the unanimous votes suggest that any such issue was not politically divisive in the legislative process.

Impact

SB 2730 amends Section 41-59-5 and Section 7-9-70 of the Mississippi Code to change how Mississippi Burn Care Fund appropriations are administered. The State Board of Health must equitably divide those funds among all certified health centers until the University of Mississippi Medical Center burn center is operational, after which appropriations shift to UMMC for burn center operations. The bill also conforms the fund statute to this framework and preserves the existing authority for burn care planning, patient transfer, and related reimbursements.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have enjoyed unanimous, bipartisan support throughout the legislative process. It passed both chambers without a single dissenting vote and the conference report was adopted unanimously as well. The available record suggests the measure was viewed as a practical funding and administration update rather than a controversial policy change.

Contention

The only notable policy issue in the bill is how to distribute Mississippi Burn Care Fund money before the state burn center is fully operational. The amended language requires the Board of Health to divide funds equitably among all certified health centers, which could affect how hospitals and burn-treatment providers share limited resources. No recorded opposition or committee debate is available, and the unanimous votes indicate that any disagreement over allocation was minimal or resolved before final passage.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.