Mississippi 2025 Regular Session

Mississippi Senate Bill SB2690

Introduced
1/20/25  
Refer
1/20/25  
Engrossed
2/7/25  
Refer
2/13/25  
Enrolled
3/18/25  

Caption

Health Care Expendable Fund; delete repealer on.

Summary

SB 2690 amends Mississippi Code Section 43-13-407 governing the Health Care Expendable Fund. The bill’s core purpose is to delete the existing July 1, 2025 repealer on several subsections of that statute, thereby preserving the legal framework that establishes and funds the Health Care Expendable Fund and directs how money is transferred into it. The fund is used exclusively for health care purposes and is supported by transfers from the Health Care Trust Fund, tobacco settlement installment payments, and investment earnings. By removing the repealer, the bill keeps in place the provisions that govern annual transfers, the handling of tobacco settlement payments, the treatment of unspent balances, and the authority to use the fund for appropriated health care spending. It also preserves the mechanism allowing the State Treasurer to borrow temporarily from other state special funds to address cash-flow shortages and the provision allowing transfers to help cover Medicaid deficits when projected expenditures exceed appropriations. The bill’s practical effect is to continue Mississippi’s existing health care financing structure beyond the date when key provisions would otherwise expire. That means the Health Care Expendable Fund remains available for legislative appropriation, and the state retains the statutory authority to direct tobacco settlement revenues and related investment income into that fund for health care-related uses. The bill does not create a new program or tax; it extends the life of an existing funding mechanism. The overall sentiment around SB 2690 appears strongly favorable and noncontroversial. It passed the Senate 50-0, the House 119-0, and the Senate concurred in the House amendment 51-0, indicating broad bipartisan support and no recorded opposition in the votes provided. There were no committee transcript snippets included, so no additional debate is reflected in the record supplied. The main point of contention, at least as a matter of policy, is the continued dedication of tobacco settlement and trust fund resources to health care spending rather than allowing the repealed provisions to lapse. Supporters likely viewed the bill as necessary to maintain stable health care funding and Medicaid support, while any theoretical concern would center on preserving a long-running special fund structure and the associated transfers from other state resources. However, the unanimous votes suggest those concerns did not generate meaningful opposition in the legislative process.

Impact

SB 2690 amends Section 43-13-407 of the Mississippi Code to remove the July 1, 2025 repeal of subsections governing the Health Care Expendable Fund. As a result, the statutory provisions controlling fund transfers, tobacco settlement deposits, investment income, cash-flow borrowing, and the exclusive use of the fund for health care purposes remain in effect after that date. The bill preserves the state’s existing health care financing and Medicaid support framework and prevents the automatic expiration of those provisions.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have had overwhelmingly positive and bipartisan support. It passed both chambers unanimously, with no recorded dissent in the vote history provided. The absence of committee transcript material limits insight into debate, but the voting record indicates the measure was viewed as routine and broadly acceptable.

Contention

No major contention is evident in the available record. The only substantive policy issue is whether to continue the Health Care Expendable Fund structure and its dedicated revenue streams beyond the scheduled repeal date. In principle, that choice affects how tobacco settlement money and trust fund earnings are allocated, and it preserves the state’s ability to use the fund for Medicaid shortfalls and other health care purposes. The unanimous votes suggest these issues did not produce significant disagreement among legislators.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.