Mississippi 2025 Regular Session

Mississippi Senate Bill SB2574

Introduced
1/20/25  
Refer
1/20/25  
Engrossed
2/6/25  
Refer
2/11/25  

Caption

Public works contracts; increase the threshold for performance and payment bonds.

Summary

SB 2574 amends Mississippi’s public works contracting law to raise the dollar threshold for a limited exception from $25,000 to $50,000. Under current law, when a public contract is below the threshold, the public owner may choose to make a lump-sum payment at completion and is not required to obtain performance and payment bonds. The bill keeps that structure but expands it to cover more small public construction, alteration, and repair contracts. The measure does not change the bonding requirements for contracts above the threshold, nor does it alter the existing rules governing who may sue on a payment bond, notice requirements, or the general liability insurance requirement for most public contracts.

Impact

The bill directly amends Section 31-5-51 of the Mississippi Code, affecting state, county, municipal, and other public authority construction contracts. Its main legal effect is to increase the number of public works projects that can proceed without performance and payment bonds and with lump-sum payment at completion, potentially reducing administrative and surety costs for smaller projects. Public bodies will have broader discretion for contracts under $50,000, while contractors, subcontractors, laborers, and material suppliers on those projects will no longer have bond-based protections unless the public owner chooses otherwise.

Sentiment

The available voting history suggests the bill was noncontroversial in the Senate, passing 51-0 on February 6, 2025. No committee transcript excerpts were provided, and there is no recorded opposition in the materials supplied. The bill’s title and committee referral to Accountability, Efficiency, and Transparency indicate it was framed as a procedural or efficiency measure rather than a major policy change.

Contention

No specific points of contention are documented in the provided materials. The most likely policy tradeoff is between reducing costs and paperwork for smaller public works contracts and preserving the protection that performance and payment bonds provide to public owners, subcontractors, and suppliers. Any concern would likely center on whether raising the exemption threshold from $25,000 to $50,000 increases risk on smaller public projects by removing bond requirements more often.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MS HB1

Economic development; provide incentives for certain economic development projects.

MS SB2001

Economic development; provide incentives for certain economic development projects.

MS HB2

Appropriation; additional to MDA for certain projects.

MS SB2002

Appropriation; additional to MDA for certain projects.

MS HB1

Project Atlas Fund; create.

MS SB2001

Project Poppy Fund; create.

Similar Bills

CA AB1931

Insurance: home protection companies.

CA AB2187

Public contracts: contracts for services.

AZ HB2895

Task order contracts; website; posting

AZ HB2445

task order contracts; website; posting

CA AB1809

Public contracts: school and community college districts.

CA SB272

San Mateo County Transit District: job order contracting: pilot program.

CA AB483

Fixed term installment contracts: early termination fees.

NJ S3306

Requires notification to members of health club if club is to be sold and health club services contract assigned to new owner.