Mississippi 2025 Regular Session

Mississippi House Bill HB330

Introduced
1/10/25  
Refer
1/10/25  

Caption

Appropriation; Town of Alligator for the 2022 water and sewer improvement project.

Summary

House Bill 330 is a fiscal appropriation bill that directs $450,000 from the Mississippi State General Fund to the governing authorities of the Town of Alligator. The money is intended to help cover costs associated with the town’s 2022 water and sewer improvement project for fiscal year 2026, which runs from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026. The bill does not create a new program or regulatory scheme; instead, it provides a one-time state funding allocation for a specific local infrastructure project. It also sets out the standard payment mechanism, requiring the State Treasurer to disburse the funds upon warrants issued by the State Fiscal Officer, and makes the act effective July 1, 2025.

Impact

HB330 would amend state spending for fiscal year 2026 by appropriating $450,000 from the General Fund to a single municipality, the Town of Alligator, for water and sewer infrastructure costs. Its practical effect is to support completion or continuation of a local utility improvement project, while leaving existing state statutes governing appropriations, treasury disbursement, and fiscal officer warrant procedures in place. The bill primarily affects the Town of Alligator and, indirectly, residents and utility users who rely on the water and sewer system.

Sentiment

The available record shows little to no recorded debate, committee testimony, or vote history, so there is no documented opposition or support beyond the bill’s introduction. Based on the text, the measure appears straightforward and routine, consistent with a local appropriations bill aimed at infrastructure assistance. The absence of recorded controversy suggests the bill was treated as a targeted funding request rather than a policy dispute.

Contention

No specific points of contention are documented in the provided materials. If any concerns were to arise, they would likely center on the use of state general funds for a single town’s project, the size of the appropriation, or whether the project should be financed locally rather than through state assistance. However, the transcript and vote record provided do not identify any legislators, agencies, or stakeholders taking a formal position for or against the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.