Mississippi 2025 Regular Session

Mississippi House Bill HB185

Introduced
1/10/25  
Refer
1/10/25  
Engrossed
2/6/25  
Refer
2/17/25  

Caption

State agency teamwork policies; extend repealer on.

Summary

House Bill 185 amends Section 25-1-98 of the Mississippi Code to extend the sunset date for the state telework policy provisions. Under current law, state service agencies may authorize telework for employees if the agency adopts a State Personnel Board-approved telework policy and follows requirements for confidentiality, supervision, employee agreements, public access, and reporting. This bill does not create a new telework program; it keeps the existing framework in place for a longer period by moving the repeal date for those telework provisions from July 1, 2025, to July 1, 2028. The bill also preserves the existing rules governing state office hours, full-time workday expectations, and annual reporting on telework use. Agencies that allow telework must continue reporting employee names, job titles, and telework schedules to the State Personnel Board, which in turn must submit annual reports to legislative committees. The act takes effect July 1, 2025, so the extension applies before the prior repeal date would have eliminated the telework authority.

Impact

HB185 affects Mississippi Code Section 25-1-98 by extending the life of subsections (2) through (6), which authorize and regulate telework for state service agencies. It keeps in force the State Personnel Board’s oversight role, agency reporting obligations, confidentiality safeguards, and requirements that agencies maintain some in-office staff for public contact. The practical effect is to continue allowing state agencies to use telework arrangements under existing rules for three additional years, until July 1, 2028.

Sentiment

The available voting history suggests broad support for the bill, as the House passed it 116-1. No committee transcripts were provided, so there is no recorded debate to indicate significant opposition or concern in the materials supplied. Overall, the bill appears to have been treated as a routine extension of an existing administrative policy rather than a controversial policy change.

Contention

The main point of contention, to the extent one exists, is the continued use of telework in state government and the oversight conditions attached to it. Supporters appear to favor preserving agency flexibility and the existing telework framework, while any opposition would likely center on accountability, supervision, public access to offices, and whether telework should remain available at all. The bill’s reporting requirements and mandatory in-office coverage provisions reflect those concerns by balancing flexibility with transparency and direct public service.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.