Mississippi Hemoglobin A1c Screening Coverage Act; create and require health insurance coverage for.
Summary
House Bill 1220 would create the Mississippi Hemoglobin A1c Screening Coverage Act and require most health insurance policies and health plans in Mississippi that cover preventive services to provide 100% coverage for hemoglobin A1c screenings when performed as part of an annual wellness exam. The bill defines the screening, the relevant insurance providers, and the annual wellness exam, and it bars deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, or other cost-sharing for the test when covered under the act.
The measure applies to policies issued, renewed, amended, or continued on or after July 1, 2025. It directs the Mississippi Department of Insurance to notify insurers, monitor compliance, and enforce the law through penalties under existing insurance regulatory authority. The bill also expressly exempts self-insured employer plans governed by ERISA, while encouraging voluntary compliance by those employers.
HB1220 also amends Section 25-15-9 of the Mississippi Code to require the State and School Employees Health Insurance Plan to cover hemoglobin A1c screenings as part of annual wellness exams. In doing so, it extends the new preventive coverage requirement to the state employee health plan and makes the screening part of the benefits package for state and school employees. The bill leaves the rest of the state plan structure intact, including existing provisions on telemedicine, retiree coverage, and life insurance benefits.
The overall sentiment reflected in the bill text is supportive of preventive care and early diabetes detection, with the stated purpose of improving public health outcomes and reducing long-term healthcare costs. Because there are no committee transcripts or recorded votes provided, there is no documented opposition or public debate in the available materials. The bill appears framed as a health-benefit expansion rather than a controversial restructuring of coverage.
The main point of potential contention is cost and mandate scope. Insurers and employers could object to a new required benefit, especially the prohibition on cost-sharing, though the bill limits its reach by exempting ERISA self-funded plans. Another possible issue is administrative enforcement by the Department of Insurance and the impact on premiums or plan design, but no specific objections are recorded in the provided history.
Impact
The bill would add a new mandated preventive benefit to Mississippi insurance law by requiring covered health plans to pay the full cost of hemoglobin A1c screenings without patient cost-sharing. It would also amend the state employee health insurance statute to incorporate the same screening coverage into the State and School Employees Health Insurance Plan. The Department of Insurance would gain explicit responsibility to enforce compliance against regulated insurers, while self-insured ERISA plans would remain outside the mandate.
Sentiment
The available materials suggest a generally favorable, public-health-oriented sentiment toward the bill. Its stated goal is early detection and management of diabetes and pre-diabetes, and the measure is written as a preventive coverage expansion for both private insurance and the state employee plan. No committee testimony or vote record is provided, so there is no documented opposition or divided vote to indicate broader controversy.
Contention
The likely areas of contention are the new insurance mandate, the elimination of deductibles and copays for the screening, and the potential cost impact on insurers and premium payers. Employers with self-funded plans are exempt under ERISA, which may reduce opposition from large employers but also limits the bill’s reach. The Department of Insurance’s enforcement role and the requirement that the state employee plan comply could also raise implementation concerns, though no specific objections are recorded in the provided history.
Requires movie theaters to provide effective communication devices for individuals with visual or hearing impairment; expands protections under "Law Against Discrimination."