Mississippi 2024 Regular Session

Mississippi House Bill HB652

Introduced
1/24/24  
Refer
1/24/24  
Engrossed
3/7/24  
Refer
3/18/24  
Enrolled
4/27/24  

Caption

State Port Authority and other ports; delete repealer on authority to use design-build method of contracting.

Impact

This bill is designed to maintain and potentially enhance the functioning of the State Port Authority by providing greater flexibility in contracting methods. By extending the utilization of design-build contracts, the legislation is anticipated to streamline project delivery for construction and improvements at ports. Consequently, this could lead to expedited infrastructure development, which is crucial for supporting Mississippi's economic interests. The continuation of this contracting method reinforces the state's commitment to facilitating efficient services in its port sector.

Summary

House Bill 652 aims to amend Section 59-5-37 of the Mississippi Code of 1972, extending the provision that allows the State Port Authority and other ports to utilize the design-build method for contracting certain projects. This method combines both design and construction phases into a single contract, which proponents argue increases efficiency and reduces costs for port projects. The bill is part of an effort to improve the operational capabilities of the state's ports, which are vital for economic development and trade in Mississippi.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 652 appears to be supportive, particularly among those invested in economic development, including business leaders and port authorities. Many stakeholders believe that this legislative change is necessary to modernize operations and ensure state ports can compete effectively. However, there could be some apprehension regarding oversight and procurement practices as these methods may bypass traditional bidding processes, which some critics argue could lead to less transparency in public contracts.

Contention

The primary point of contention surrounding HB 652 revolves around the balance between efficiency in procurement and ensuring rigorous oversight in how public funds are spent. Critics may raise concerns that reliance on the design-build method could compromise quality or accountability in projects overseen by the State Port Authority. Hence, while the bill enjoys general support, there remains a cautious outlook regarding how these changes affect procurement ethics and transparency in port operations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MS HB213

Alabama State Port Authority; Code Commissioner authorized to change references to Alabama State Port Authority, State Port Authority, and Alabama State Docks Department to Alabama Port Authority, provisions establishing the Alabama Port Authority repealed

MS SB1146

Modifies provisions relating to port authorities

MS SB2618

Airport facilities; authorize contracting with companies for financing, designing, constructing, operating or maintaining of.

MS SB715

Modifies provisions relating to port authorities

MS HB1346

Modifies provisions governing port authorities

MS HB2693

Modifies provisions relating to port authorities

MS HB1656

Modifies provisions governing port authorities

MS HB1632

State service employees; extend repealer on authority to telework and bring forward certain other statutes.

MS H4073

Manatee County Port Authority, Manatee County

MS SB3032

Relating to the name and powers of the Sabine Pass Port Authority; altering the terms of the authority's port commission; altering the authority to issue bonds.

Similar Bills

CA AB1931

Insurance: home protection companies.

CA AB2187

Public contracts: contracts for services.

AZ HB2895

Task order contracts; website; posting

AZ HB2445

task order contracts; website; posting

CA AB1809

Public contracts: school and community college districts.

CA SB272

San Mateo County Transit District: job order contracting: pilot program.

CA AB483

Fixed term installment contracts: early termination fees.

NJ S3306

Requires notification to members of health club if club is to be sold and health club services contract assigned to new owner.