Missouri 2026 Regular Session

Missouri Senate Bill SB1152

Introduced
1/7/26  
Introduced
12/31/69  

Caption

SB 1152

Impact

If enacted, SB 1152 would significantly alter the legal framework governing municipal elections, impacting the process and scheduling of elections in Missouri. The most notable change includes the introduction of new laws simplifying the election process and providing precise guidelines for appointing successors when vacancies occur in elective offices, thus potentially enhancing efficiency in local governance. Moreover, it clarifies when elections are to be scheduled, which could help prevent delays in filling vacant positions within municipal governments.

Summary

Senate Bill 1152, introduced by Senator Nicola, aims to modify various provisions related to municipal elections in Missouri. The bill proposes the repeal of several existing statutes covering the appointment of successors in elective offices, the scheduling of general and primary election days, and procedures for nonpartisan elections. In lieu of the repealed sections, twelve new sections will be enacted, establishing clearer regulations for how vacancies are handled and defining the roles of election authorities more explicitly. The overall intent is to simplify the election process at the municipal level.

Contention

Debates around SB 1152 may center on concerns regarding local governance authority. Proponents of the bill argue that standardizing election procedures will create clarity and consistency across municipalities, potentially increasing voter participation and trust in the system. However, detractors may raise points about the implications for local control and flexibility in managing elections, fearing that uniform procedures could overlook the unique needs of smaller or less populated areas.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MO SB86

Modifies provisions relating to municipal elections

MO SB248

Modifies provisions relating to elections

MO SB670

Reinstates the Presidential Preference Primary Election

MO SB417

Reinstates the Presidential Preference Primary Election

MO HJR27

Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to the consolidation of St. Louis County and St. Louis City

MO SB20

Modifies provisions relating to sales taxes for early childhood education

MO SB547

Modifies provisions relating to law enforcement sales taxes

MO SB335

Requires special elections to fill vacancies in statewide elected offices other than U.S. Senator

MO SB255

Allows the Board of Trustees of the Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis to act as trustees and administer other pension plans

MO SB486

Modifies provisions relating to public libraries in charter counties

Similar Bills

CA AB2570

Elderly Parole Program.

MN SF1826

Payment rates establishment for certain substance use disorder treatment services

MN HF1994

Payment rates established for certain substance use disorder treatment services, and vendor eligibility recodified for payments from the behavioral health fund.

TX HB1080

Relating to the publication of required notice by a political subdivision by alternative media.

CA SB680

Sex offender registration: unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor.

CA AB387

An act to amend Section 219 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to juries.

CA SB689

Local jurisdictions: district-based elections.

US HB31

Cover Outstanding Vulnerable Expansion-eligible Residents Now Act or the COVER Now Act This bill establishes a demonstration program to allow local governments to provide health benefits to the Medicaid expansion population in states that have not expanded Medicaid. Under the program, local governments may provide coverage for individuals who are newly eligible for Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (i.e., the Medicaid expansion population) for a maximum of 10 years, or until their respective states expand Medicaid. The bill provides a 100% federal matching rate for the first three years of program participation. The bill prohibits states from taking certain actions against participating localities, such as withholding funding, increasing taxes, or restricting provider participation. States that violate these requirements are subject to certain funding penalties.