SB 1107 creates a new section of Missouri law regulating paid assistance in veterans benefits matters. The bill defines key terms such as “compensation,” “person,” and “veterans benefits matter,” and then places limits on who may be paid to advise, assist, or refer individuals seeking veterans benefits. In general, it prohibits compensation for advising or assisting with veterans benefits matters except as allowed under federal law, bars paid referral arrangements, and requires any paid service provider to use a written agreement that complies with federal veterans-claims rules.
The bill also restricts when fees may be collected and how service providers may market themselves. It prohibits payment for services performed before a notice of disagreement is filed, forbids guarantees about outcomes or benefit amounts, and bars excessive or unreasonable fees. In addition, it requires both oral and written disclosures making clear that the business is not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, the Missouri Veterans’ Commission, or other veterans service organizations, and that free help may be available from those entities. Advertising for paid veterans benefits services must include similar disclosures, and violations are classified as a class A misdemeanor.
Impact
If enacted, SB 1107 would add section 42.028 to Missouri statutes and create a state-level regulatory framework for paid veterans benefits assistance. It would affect private individuals and businesses that charge fees for helping veterans, dependents, or survivors with claims or benefit applications, while expressly excluding the Missouri Veterans’ Commission from the definition of “person.” The bill would also incorporate federal standards from 38 CFR 14.636 into state law for written agreements and fee reasonableness, and it would create criminal penalties for noncompliance.
Sentiment
Based on the bill text and the absence of recorded committee debate or votes in the provided materials, the measure appears to be framed as a consumer-protection and anti-fraud bill aimed at protecting veterans from misleading paid claims assistance. The overall tone of the legislation is restrictive toward paid third-party advisers, but supportive of veterans by emphasizing disclosures, free public assistance options, and limits on fees and promises. No contrary sentiment is documented in the provided record.
Contention
The main policy tension in SB 1107 is between protecting veterans from deceptive or overpriced claims assistance and preserving the ability of private entities to charge for legitimate services. Potential points of contention include the broad prohibition on compensation for advising or assisting in veterans benefits matters except as allowed by federal law, the ban on paid referrals, and the criminal penalty for violations. Another likely issue is whether the disclosure and contract requirements are burdensome for businesses that operate in this space, especially those advertising online or providing remote services.
Appropriates money for the expenses, grants, refunds, and distributions of statewide elected officials, the Judiciary, the Office of the State Public Defender, and the General Assembly