Missouri 2025 Regular Session

Missouri House Bill HB1116

Introduced
1/29/25  
Refer
1/30/25  
Report Pass
2/11/25  
Refer
2/11/25  
Report Pass
2/20/25  
Engrossed
3/26/25  

Caption

Allows real property owners building a fence to enter an adjoining property up to ten feet without liability for trespassing

Summary

HB 1116 amends Missouri’s fence and enclosure statutes by creating two new sections, one in each of the state’s division-fence frameworks. The bill allows a landowner, or a contractor hired by the landowner, to enter up to ten feet onto adjoining property for the length of a division fence when constructing, maintaining, or repairing a fence used to enclose fields or enclosures where animals are kept. The entry is expressly exempted from trespass liability so long as the person does not go beyond the ten-foot limit, and the bill also states that the person remains liable for any damages caused by the entry, including crop damage. The bill further provides that a landowner or contractor is not liable for damages for clearing or removing trees, brush, or vegetation that lies directly on the property boundary line when needed to build or repair the fence on the boundary. It also clarifies that the authority does not extend to entering buildings on the adjoining property. The new sections do not apply when the neighboring property is owned or operated by a utility company, railroad, zoo, wildlife conservation facility, or accredited animal sanctuary. In practical terms, the bill changes state property and agricultural fence law by giving landowners a limited right of access across neighboring land to complete fence work, while preserving liability for actual damage caused during that access. It is aimed at reducing disputes and legal uncertainty around boundary-line fence construction and maintenance, especially in rural and livestock settings. The available voting history suggests the bill had generally favorable support in the House, with consent passage votes showing substantial majorities. No committee transcript was provided, so there is no recorded debate to indicate formal opposition or amendments in discussion. Overall, the sentiment appears supportive and pragmatic, focused on clarifying fence-access rights rather than creating a broader property-rights change. The main point of contention is the balance between a landowner’s need to access neighboring land to build or repair a fence and the adjoining owner’s property rights. The bill limits that access to ten feet and preserves damage liability, which appears designed to address concerns about overreach. The carve-outs for utilities, railroads, zoos, wildlife facilities, and accredited sanctuaries also suggest sensitivity to special-use properties where ordinary fence-access rules may not fit.

Impact

HB 1116 adds sections 272.138 and 272.380 to Missouri law, modifying the state’s division-fence provisions for livestock and enclosure fencing. It creates a limited statutory privilege to enter adjacent property for fence construction, maintenance, or repair, while preserving liability for damages and excluding entry into buildings. The bill also creates exceptions for certain types of neighboring properties, including utilities, railroads, zoos, wildlife conservation facilities, and accredited animal sanctuaries.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have been received positively in the House, as reflected by strong consent votes on third reading. With no committee transcript available, there is no documented floor or committee debate to suggest organized opposition. The overall tone of the legislation is practical and clarifying, aimed at resolving fence-access issues for landowners rather than advancing a controversial policy change.

Contention

The central issue is whether a landowner should be allowed to enter neighboring property to construct or repair a division fence without being treated as a trespasser. Support for the bill likely comes from agricultural and rural property interests seeking a clearer right of access, while potential concerns would come from adjoining landowners worried about intrusion, crop damage, or misuse of the access right. The bill addresses those concerns by limiting entry to ten feet, preserving liability for damages, and excluding buildings and certain sensitive property types.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB2323

Relating to the cessation of tolls by toll project entities in certain circumstances.

CA AB1157

Tenancy: just cause termination: rent increases.

CA SB371

Transportation network companies: insurance coverage.

MO HB2576

Creates several new state designations

CA AB1363

Protective orders: Wyland’s Law.

TX HB5346

Relating to the cessation of tolls by toll project entities in certain circumstances.

CA AB628

Hiring of real property: dwellings: untenantability.

CA AB810

Local government: internet websites and email addresses.