Commissioner of human services instruction to authorize indirect billing for individualized home supports
Summary
SF400 directs the Minnesota Commissioner of Human Services to seek federal approval to allow providers of individualized home supports to bill for certain “indirect” services under home and community-based services waiver plans. The bill covers individualized home supports with training, without training, and with family training, and it requires the commissioner to submit the necessary waiver amendments to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services by December 1, 2025.
The bill defines indirect provision of services as services delivered without direct contact and not through remote support, and it limits billing to situations where the indirect work is needed to maintain continuity of services, where the recipient cannot reasonably be directly involved, or where the recipient has made an informed choice to receive services without direct contact. It specifically identifies categories of billable indirect work, including transportation planning, healthcare coordination, legal and crisis support, employment support, basic-needs coordination, independent living supports, and coordination with other providers and natural supports.
Impact
If approved by CMS and implemented through waiver amendments, the bill would expand what individualized home support providers may bill for under Minnesota’s home and community-based services programs. It would affect Medicaid waiver administration, provider reimbursement practices, and the scope of covered support activities for people receiving individualized home supports, especially those living independently or needing coordination across health, housing, employment, and community services. The bill also places a deadline on the commissioner to seek federal approval and makes the directive effective July 1, 2025.
Sentiment
Based on the bill’s authorship and the absence of recorded opposition, committee discussion, or votes in the provided materials, the overall sentiment appears supportive and policy-oriented. The bill is framed as a technical but meaningful expansion of reimbursement authority for services that providers already coordinate informally, suggesting an intent to improve continuity of care and reduce gaps in support. No contrary viewpoints are documented in the supplied record.
Contention
The main potential point of contention is whether federal Medicaid authorities will approve billing for indirect services and whether the proposed categories are sufficiently specific to prevent overbilling or ambiguity. Another possible issue is the boundary between indirect services and nonbillable administrative work, especially because the bill excludes remote support and requires certain conditions before indirect billing is allowed. Stakeholders most likely to care about these issues include human services administrators, waiver providers, disability advocates, and Medicaid compliance officials.
Commissioner of human services directed to seek federal authority to provide supportive parenting services to people eligible for personal care assistance or community first services and supports, and commissioner directed to seek federal waivers.
Family support and consumer support programs provisions modifications, community first services and supports covered services modifications, and certain services under disability waivers and consumer-directed community supports authorization direction to the commissioner
Family support and consumer support programs modified, community first services and supports covered services modified, and commissioner directed to allow certain services under the disability waivers and consumer-directed community supports.
Housing stabilization services repealer provision, commissioners authority to terminate or modify the medical assistance program clarifying provision, and one-time rate add-on for prepayment review delays provision