Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Minnesota Senate Bill SF3504

Introduced
5/9/25  

Caption

210th Ave reconstruction in Pope County bond issue and appropriation

Summary

SF3504 is a capital investment bill that appropriates $5 million from the state transportation fund’s bond proceeds account for work on 210th Avenue in Pope County. The money would be available as grants to the city of Glenwood, Glenwood Township, or Leven Township, individually or together, for acquiring permanent easements and right-of-way and for predesign, design, construction, and reconstruction of the roadway segment between marked Trunk Highway 28 and Pope County State-Aid Highway 28. To finance the appropriation, the bill authorizes the commissioner of management and budget to sell and issue up to $5 million in state bonds under Minnesota’s general bonding statutes and constitutional bonding authority. The section would take effect the day after final enactment, making it an immediate infrastructure funding measure if approved.

Impact

The bill would add a new state-funded transportation capital project to Minnesota law by directing bond proceeds to a specific local road reconstruction effort in Pope County. It would authorize state debt issuance up to $5 million and channel those funds through the commissioner of transportation to local governmental entities for land acquisition, engineering, and construction related to 210th Avenue. The practical effect is to support local infrastructure improvement while increasing state bonding obligations.

Sentiment

The available record shows no committee transcript, vote tally, or recorded debate, so there is no direct evidence of support or opposition in the materials provided. Based on the bill’s narrow infrastructure focus and local project purpose, it appears to be a routine capital investment proposal rather than a broadly controversial policy measure. The introduction and referral to the Capital Investment Committee suggest it was being processed as a standard bonding request.

Contention

No specific points of contention are documented in the provided materials. Potential issues that could arise in a bill of this type would typically involve the use of state bonding capacity, the prioritization of a single local project over other capital requests, and the allocation of funds among Glenwood, Glenwood Township, and Leven Township. However, none of those concerns are explicitly raised in the text or context supplied.

Companion Bills

MN HF3206

Similar To Pope County; 210th Avenue reconstruction funding provided, bonds issued, and money appropriated.

Previously Filed As

MN HF3206

Pope County; 210th Avenue reconstruction funding provided, bonds issued, and money appropriated.

MN SF1265

Dakota County Interstate 35 and County State-Aid Highway 50 interchange reconstruction bond issue and appropriation

MN SF1644

Hennepin Avenue suspension bridge reconstruction bond issue and appropriation

MN SF21

Sibley County highway reconstruction bond issue and appropriation

MN SF1320

Rogers Main Street reconstruction bond issue and appropriation

MN SF4854

Minneapolis West Broadway Avenue reconstruction bond issue and appropriation

MN SF405

Fairmont street reconstruction bond issue and appropriation

MN SF338

34th Street in Slayton reconstruction bond issue and appropriation

MN HF1349

Dakota County; Interstate 35 and County State-Aid Highway 50 interchange reconstruction funding provided, bonds issued, and money appropriated.

MN HF998

Hennepin Avenue suspension bridge reconstruction funding provided, bonds issued, and money appropriated.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.