Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Minnesota House Bill HF4539

Introduced
3/23/26  

Caption

Safe storage standards for firearms established, criminal penalties for failing to meet those standards established, and money appropriated.

Summary

HF4539 establishes a new statewide safe-storage framework for firearms in Minnesota and amends the state’s negligent storage statute. The bill requires that a firearm be either unloaded and equipped with a locking device, or stored loaded or unloaded in a locked firearm storage unit or locked gun room, unless it is under the owner’s direct physical control. It defines key terms such as firearm, authorized user, child, firearm storage unit, gun room, loaded, and locking device. The bill also creates a tiered penalty structure for violations. A person who fails to comply with the storage requirements is subject to a petty misdemeanor, but the offense becomes a gross misdemeanor if a child is present in the area where the firearm is stored. More serious penalties apply if an unsecured firearm is accessed by a child or prohibited person, or if an unsecured firearm is used in a felony crime of violence or to cause serious injury or death, with felony penalties of up to three or five years in prison and fines up to $5,000 or $10,000 depending on the circumstance. The bill includes exceptions for unlawful entry and for firearms involved in lawful transportation, hunting, shooting sports, instructional courses, law enforcement duties, and storage at police or sheriff stations. In addition to the criminal-law changes, HF4539 appropriates $10,000 in fiscal year 2027 to the Department of Corrections for implementation costs, with a base appropriation of $19,000 beginning in fiscal year 2028. The bill is effective August 1, 2026, and applies to crimes committed on or after that date. Because no committee transcript or vote record is provided, there is no documented debate or recorded sentiment in the materials supplied. Based on the bill text alone, the measure appears aimed at preventing child access to unsecured firearms and reducing accidental shootings, while also imposing stronger accountability for negligent storage. Potential points of contention likely center on the scope of criminal liability, the felony penalties for storage failures that lead to access or misuse, and whether the mandated storage methods are practical or burdensome for lawful gun owners.

Impact

The bill would amend Minnesota Statutes section 609.666 by replacing the existing negligent safe-storage language with a more detailed statutory storage requirement and a graduated penalty scheme. It would create new legal obligations for firearm owners regarding locking devices, locked storage units, and locked gun rooms, and it would expand criminal exposure from petty misdemeanor to felony depending on the presence of a child, access by a prohibited person, or resulting violent use. The bill also adds a small appropriation to the Department of Corrections for implementation-related costs.

Sentiment

No committee discussion or vote history is included, so there is no recorded legislative sentiment to summarize. From the bill’s structure, the measure appears to reflect a public-safety-oriented approach focused on preventing unauthorized access to firearms, especially by children, while also preserving exceptions for hunting, sport shooting, training, law enforcement, and lawful transport. The absence of recorded testimony means support or opposition cannot be attributed to specific legislators, stakeholders, or advocacy groups from the provided materials.

Contention

The main likely points of contention are the bill’s mandatory storage requirements and the criminal penalties tied to noncompliance. Gun rights advocates may object to the breadth of the storage mandate, the definition of secure storage, and the possibility of felony liability when a firearm is accessed by a child or prohibited person. Supporters are likely to emphasize child safety, prevention of accidental shootings, and accountability for negligent storage. The bill’s exceptions for hunting, shooting sports, and law enforcement suggest an effort to narrow objections, but the felony provisions remain the most significant flashpoint.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.