Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Minnesota House Bill HF304

Introduced
2/10/25  

Caption

Motor Fuels tax indexed increases repealed.

Summary

HF304 amends Minnesota’s electric vehicle registration surcharge statute. The bill increases the flat surcharge on all-electric vehicles from $75 to $137 and keeps the charge in addition to the regular vehicle registration tax. It also preserves the existing annual indexing mechanism, under which the commissioner of public safety must adjust the surcharge each year based on increases in the gasoline excise tax rate, with the adjusted amount rounded to the nearest dollar and not allowed to fall below the prior adjusted amount. The bill directs revenue from the surcharge to the highway user tax distribution fund, which is the state account used for transportation-related funding. The change applies to registration periods starting on or after July 1, 2025, and takes effect the day after final enactment. In practical terms, the bill would raise the cost of registering an all-electric vehicle in Minnesota and increase transportation revenue tied to electric vehicle ownership.

Impact

HF304 would amend Minnesota Statutes section 168.013, subdivision 1m, changing the all-electric vehicle surcharge and affecting how much EV owners pay when registering their vehicles. It would increase the base surcharge from $75 to $137 and continue annual adjustments tied to gasoline tax increases, while maintaining the deposit of those revenues into the highway user tax distribution fund. The bill would therefore affect electric vehicle owners, vehicle registration administration, and transportation funding streams in state law.

Sentiment

There is no committee transcript or recorded vote information provided, so the bill’s sentiment can only be inferred from its text and caption. The measure appears to reflect a policy preference for increasing transportation revenue and aligning EV-related fees more closely with road funding needs. Because the bill raises costs for all-electric vehicle owners, it would likely draw support from those favoring user-fee-based transportation funding and criticism from EV advocates or those concerned about discouraging electric vehicle adoption.

Contention

The main point of contention is likely the higher surcharge on all-electric vehicles, which shifts more registration cost onto EV owners. Supporters would likely argue that electric vehicles should contribute more to highway funding as gasoline tax revenue declines, while opponents may argue the increase is too steep, could slow EV adoption, or unfairly penalizes cleaner vehicles. Another possible issue is the continued indexing of the fee to gasoline tax increases, which ties EV fees to a tax structure that does not directly apply to electric vehicles.

Companion Bills

MN SF1747

Similar To Motor fuels tax indexed increases repealer

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.