Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Minnesota House Bill HF2736

Introduced
3/24/25  

Caption

Mandatory fine for school bus stop-signal arm violations eliminated.

Summary

HF2736 amends Minnesota’s school bus stop-arm violation penalty statute to eliminate the mandatory minimum fine for drivers who fail to stop for a school bus or fail to keep stopped when required. Under current law, a violation is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not less than $500; the bill removes that mandatory floor while leaving the offense classification in place. The bill does not change the underlying duty to stop for a school bus, and it does not alter the separate gross misdemeanor penalties for more serious conduct involving passing a bus on the passenger side or passing when a child is outside the bus. In practical terms, the bill gives courts more discretion in sentencing for standard stop-arm violations by allowing fines below $500, while preserving criminal liability for the offense. It continues to treat the conduct as a misdemeanor and keeps enhanced penalties for aggravating circumstances involving heightened danger to children. The bill was referred to the House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee.

Impact

The bill would amend Minnesota Statutes section 169.444, subdivision 2, by striking the mandatory minimum fine language for ordinary school bus stop-signal arm violations. This changes state law from a fixed minimum financial penalty to a discretionary fine structure, but it does not remove the misdemeanor offense or the gross misdemeanor provisions for more dangerous violations. The affected parties are drivers cited for school bus stop-arm violations, courts imposing penalties, and indirectly school children and school transportation safety enforcement.

Sentiment

Based on the bill text and available context, the measure appears to be framed as a public-safety bill but with a penalty-reform approach rather than a change to enforcement of school bus stopping rules. No committee transcript or vote record is available, so there is no documented debate or recorded opposition in the provided materials. The bill’s introduction and referral suggest it was considered in the normal committee process without additional public sentiment data in the record provided.

Contention

The likely point of contention is whether removing the mandatory $500 minimum weakens deterrence for drivers who illegally pass stopped school buses. Supporters would likely view the change as restoring judicial discretion and avoiding an inflexible penalty for all cases, while opponents may argue that school bus stop-arm violations are serious safety offenses that warrant a strong mandatory fine to protect children. The bill preserves the offense and the harsher gross misdemeanor penalties, but the fine reduction itself is the central policy issue.

Companion Bills

MN SF2613

Similar To Mandatory fine elimination for school bus stop-signal arm violations

Previously Filed As

MN SF2613

Mandatory fine elimination for school bus stop-signal arm violations

MN HF1950

Mandatory fines imposed for violations of the school bus stop arm law.

MN SF737

Mandatory fines enactment for violations of the school bus stop arm law

MN HF2736

Mandatory fine for school bus stop-signal arm violations eliminated.

MN SF2797

Certain motor vehicles vehicle registration renewal period modification provision, school bus stop-signal arm law violations penalties increase provision, annual school bus inspection report requirement and report contents specifications, and electric school bus grants modification to include propane buses

MN AB2449

Schoolbuses: stop signal arm enforcement system.

MN HB530

Overtaking a stopped school bus; increase penalty for violations of.

MN HF1950

Mandatory fines imposed for violations of the school bus stop arm law.

MN SF1282

Mandatory fines proposal for violations of the street racing law

MN HF4063

First aid kit requirements on school buses modified, USDOT numbers required for all school buses, and school buses authorized on public roads for training purposes.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.