Overdose prevention education required in substance use model program.
Summary
HF2023 amends Minnesota’s education statute governing the state’s substance use model program for middle school and high school students. The bill directs the commissioner of education, in consultation with health and human services officials and other experts, to identify one or more model programs that educate students about the health effects of cannabis and substance use, including fentanyl and mixtures containing fentanyl. It also requires the commissioner to publish a list of approved model programs, with written materials, resources, and instructor training, by June 1, 2025.
The bill expands the required content of those model programs. In addition to existing topics such as the physical and mental health effects of cannabis and substance use, unsafe behaviors, signs of substance use disorders, treatment options, and healthy coping strategies, the bill adds overdose recognition, prevention, and response. The model programs must remain medically accurate, age- and developmentally appropriate, culturally inclusive, and science-based.
Impact
HF2023 changes Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 120B.215, subdivision 1, by broadening the required scope of the state’s substance use education model program. It affects the Department of Education’s responsibilities in selecting and publishing model curricula and resources, and it influences what school districts may use to meet local standards for health education. The practical impact is to ensure that overdose prevention education becomes part of the state-recommended framework for middle and high school substance use instruction, with particular relevance to fentanyl awareness and student safety.
Sentiment
The bill appears to have broad support. In the House, HF2023 passed 133-0, indicating unanimous approval among voting members. No committee transcript was provided, but the vote suggests the measure was viewed as a noncontroversial public health and education update focused on student safety and prevention.
Contention
No significant opposition is evident in the available record. Because the bill passed the House unanimously and there are no committee discussion snippets, there is no documented disagreement over the general goal of overdose prevention education. Any potential points of contention would likely center on curriculum content, age appropriateness, or how schools implement the model program, but those issues are not reflected in the available materials.
Students with mental illness requirements modifications provision, Department of Education approved mental health instruction requirement provision, youth sports program mental illness and suicide prevention training provision, and restrictive procedures statewide plan requirements modifications provision