Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Minnesota House Bill HF1228

Introduced
2/20/25  

Caption

Lead risk assessments grant funding provided, and money appropriated.

Summary

HF1228 appropriates $500,000 from the general fund in fiscal year 2026 to the commissioner of health for grants to two local public health agencies: the Minneapolis Health Department and the St. Paul-Ramsey County Public Health Department. Each agency would receive $250,000 to conduct lead risk assessments for children with elevated blood lead levels under Minnesota Statutes, section 144.9504. The bill is narrowly focused on funding local lead hazard response work rather than changing the underlying lead-risk-assessment statute. It directs that the money be used only for grants and expressly prohibits the commissioner from using any of the appropriation for administration, meaning the funds must go directly to assessment services in Minneapolis and St. Paul-Ramsey County.

Impact

HF1228 would increase state spending by $500,000 in fiscal year 2026 and channel that money to two local health departments for lead risk assessments tied to children with elevated blood lead levels. It does not amend the lead law itself, but it supports implementation of Minnesota Statutes, section 144.9504, by funding local public health capacity in the state’s largest urban areas. The practical effect would be to expand or sustain lead investigation and assessment services for affected children and families in those jurisdictions.

Sentiment

The available context suggests the bill is generally supportive and noncontroversial in purpose, as it addresses child health and lead exposure prevention through targeted public health funding. No committee transcript or vote record is provided, so there is no evidence of formal opposition or divided sentiment in the materials supplied. The bill’s narrow scope and direct grant structure indicate a straightforward public health appropriation.

Contention

No specific points of contention are documented in the provided materials. Potential areas of discussion, if any, would likely center on the use of state general fund dollars, the decision to limit funding to Minneapolis and St. Paul-Ramsey County, and whether the appropriation should include administrative costs. However, the bill itself precludes administrative spending, and no recorded objections, amendments, or votes are included here.

Companion Bills

MN SF1090

Similar To Grants for lead risk assessments appropriation

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.