Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

Minnesota Senate Bill SF4354

Introduced
2/29/24  

Caption

Approval requirement of certain standing committees of the legislature for adoption of rules

Impact

The impact of SF4354 on state laws focuses on enhancing legislative oversight concerning the rulemaking process of state agencies. By mandating committee approval, this bill aims to foster greater accountability and transparency in how rules are established. This legislative change could potentially slow down the rulemaking process as agencies will have to account for legislative schedules and committee votes, thereby lengthening the time it takes to enact rules governing various sectors.

Summary

SF4354 addresses the process of rule adoption by state agencies in Minnesota, requiring that certain standing committees of the legislature must approve proposed rules before they can be adopted. This legislation alters existing provisions within the Minnesota Statutes, particularly sections 14.126, 14.18, and 14.19. The amendment stipulates that an agency cannot adopt a rule unless both relevant legislative committees have voted to approve it. If the committees advise against adoption, the agency must wait until the legislative session adjourns before proceeding with any adoption.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise concerning the increased power of legislative committees over otherwise administrative processes. Supporters of the bill argue that it reinforces checks and balances by ensuring that elected representatives have a say in the regulatory framework that impacts citizens. However, opponents may view this measure as an unnecessary complication that stifles regulatory efficiency and agencies' ability to enact rules that respond swiftly to changing conditions or urgent needs in public policy.

Companion Bills

MN HF4184

Similar To Approval of standing committees of the legislature required for adoption of rules.

Previously Filed As

MN SF610

Legislative approval for adoption of rules requirement provision

MN HF895

Legislative approval required for adoption of rules.

MN SF3495

Legislative approval and the governor's signature for rules to become effective requirement provision

MN SF1438

Proposed Administrative rules cost-benefit analysis requirement provision, certain rules adoption prohibition provision, and requiring notice to the legislature upon the adoption of certain rules

MN HF936

Cost-benefit analysis required for proposed administrative rules, adoption of certain rules prohibited, and notice to legislature upon adoption of exempt rules required.

MN HF3037

Vote threshold established for certain bills heard in a standing committee of the legislature.

MN SF685

Vote threshold for certain bills heard in a standing committee of the legislature establishment

MN HR4

Adopting the House Rules of Procedure for the 89th Legislature.

MN SR19

Modifies Senate Rules 25 and 28 regarding standing committees of the Senate

MN SR1

Adopting the Rules of the Senate for the 36th Special Session of the Nevada Legislature.

Similar Bills

CA SB900

Political Reform Act of 1974: top contributors: disclosures.

TX SB1883

Relating to the approval of land use assumptions, capital improvement plans, and impact fees.

MN SF2162

State-aid engineering and design standards variances modification

MN HF2505

State-aid engineering and design standards variances modified, local road authorities authorized to adopt design elements without state-aid engineering and design variances, state-aid variance procedures modified, advisory committee established, and report required.

TX HB2225

Relating to the approval of land use assumptions, capital improvement plans, and impact fees.

CA AB950

An act to amend Sections 84502, 84503, 84504.

MN HF4434

Requirements relating to design standards and variances in certain transportation projects modified, and report required.

AR HB1028

To Amend Provisions Of The Law Concerning Obscenity And The Process For Challenging Materials Included In A Library; And To Require A Library To Have A Policy Prohibiting Book Banning In Order To Receive State Funding.