Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

Minnesota House Bill HF1955

Introduced
2/16/23  

Caption

June accelerated payment requirements repealed for cigarette and tobacco taxes and liquor taxes.

Impact

The repeal of the accelerated payment requirement is designed to simplify the process for distributors of cigarette and tobacco products, potentially making it easier for businesses to manage their cash flow. The implementation of this change is set to take effect for the June 2023 tax liabilities. By removing the prior penalty and accelerated payment mechanisms, the bill may encourage compliance among smaller distributors who may have found these requirements overly burdensome.

Summary

House File 1955 seeks to reform the way tax liabilities related to cigarette and tobacco sales are handled in Minnesota by repealing the requirement for accelerated payments of these taxes due in June. Specifically, the bill amends Minnesota Statutes to eliminate previous mandates that required distributors to pay a portion of their estimated tax liabilities two business days before the end of June. This change aims to ease the tax burden on distributors and streamline the tax payment process.

Contention

While supporters of HF1955 argue that it encourages business growth and reduces the financial strain on distributors, there may be concerns about the implications for state revenue. Critics could argue that eliminating preemptive payment requirements may delay tax collections and impact the state's budget, particularly in times when revenue is critical. Additionally, the repeal may raise concerns among advocates of public health, as it could inadvertently facilitate tobacco product sales by easing the regulatory burden on distributors.

Companion Bills

MN SF1062

Similar To Requirement repeal for June accelerated payments for cigarette and tobacco taxes and liquor taxes

Previously Filed As

MN SB20

Increase Cigarette & Tobacco Products Taxes

MN HB290

Increasing the taxes on cigarettes and electronic cigarettes and establishing a committee to study taxes on tobacco and other nicotine products.

MN HB2382

Concerning excise taxes on cigarettes, vapor products, and tobacco products.

MN HB3983

Cigarettes; cigarette excise taxes; stamps; effective date.

MN HB3606

TOBACCO-ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE

MN SB2338

TOBACCO-ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE

MN HB1251

Cigarette taxes.

MN SB3124

Tobacco/ENDS; impose ENDS excise tax, and increase other tobacco excise taxes and presumed costs of doing business.

MN AB511

The cigarette excise tax and cigarettes that involve heating tobacco without combustion. (FE)

MN SB544

The cigarette excise tax and cigarettes that involve heating tobacco without combustion. (FE)

Similar Bills

CA AB2570

Elderly Parole Program.

MN SF1826

Payment rates establishment for certain substance use disorder treatment services

MN HF1994

Payment rates established for certain substance use disorder treatment services, and vendor eligibility recodified for payments from the behavioral health fund.

TX HB1080

Relating to the publication of required notice by a political subdivision by alternative media.

CA SB680

Sex offender registration: unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor.

CA AB387

An act to amend Section 219 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to juries.

CA SB689

Local jurisdictions: district-based elections.

US HB31

Cover Outstanding Vulnerable Expansion-eligible Residents Now Act or the COVER Now Act This bill establishes a demonstration program to allow local governments to provide health benefits to the Medicaid expansion population in states that have not expanded Medicaid. Under the program, local governments may provide coverage for individuals who are newly eligible for Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (i.e., the Medicaid expansion population) for a maximum of 10 years, or until their respective states expand Medicaid. The bill provides a 100% federal matching rate for the first three years of program participation. The bill prohibits states from taking certain actions against participating localities, such as withholding funding, increasing taxes, or restricting provider participation. States that violate these requirements are subject to certain funding penalties.