A resolution to recognize April 13-14, 2026, as Holocaust Remembrance Day.
Summary
Senate Resolution 105 is a commemorative resolution recognizing April 13-14, 2026, as Holocaust Remembrance Day in Michigan. The resolution recounts the history and scale of the Holocaust, honors its victims, survivors, and liberators, and emphasizes the need to remember the atrocities committed by Nazi Germany and its collaborators. It also links Holocaust remembrance to present-day concerns about antisemitism and the broader dangers of hatred, indifference, and bigotry.
The resolution does not create or amend state law, impose duties, or appropriate funds. Its practical effect is symbolic: it places the Senate on record encouraging Michiganders to reflect on the Holocaust and to support education and remembrance efforts. The resolution also references Michigan’s existing genocide education requirement in the social studies curriculum for grades 8-12, reinforcing the state’s educational framework rather than changing it.
Impact
SR0105 has no direct legal effect and does not alter any statutes. It is a Senate resolution that serves as a formal statement of recognition and remembrance, rather than legislation regulating conduct or government operations. Its main policy relevance is rhetorical and educational, reinforcing existing Michigan curriculum requirements related to genocide education and encouraging public awareness of antisemitism and historical atrocities.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the resolution is strongly supportive and solemn. The sponsors frame it as a moral and educational statement, and the Senate adopted it unanimously by resolution on April 14, 2026. The text reflects broad bipartisan agreement on the importance of Holocaust remembrance, antisemitism awareness, and honoring victims and survivors.
Contention
There is little visible contention in the available record because there were no committee transcripts or recorded votes against the resolution. The only potentially sensitive elements are the resolution’s references to contemporary antisemitic incidents, including the attack on Temple Israel in West Bloomfield, and its broader discussion of hatred, gender identity, sexual orientation, and other groups targeted by Nazi persecution. However, the bill text presents these points as part of a remembrance and warning against intolerance, not as disputed policy provisions.