Michigan Senate Bill SR0047

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/14/25
• Passed: 5/14/25

Caption

A resolution to commemorate May 11-17, 2025, as Police Week.

Summary

Senate Resolution 47 is a commemorative resolution designating May 11-17, 2025, as Police Week in Michigan. It recognizes National Police Week and National Peace Officers Memorial Day, honors law enforcement officers who have died in the line of duty, and acknowledges the service of police officers at the local, state, and national levels. The resolution cites the historical origins of Police Week, references the number of officers serving in Michigan and across the country, and notes the risks and sacrifices associated with law enforcement service. The resolution does not create or amend statutory law, impose duties, or appropriate funds. Its effect is symbolic and declaratory: it formally expresses the Senate’s appreciation for police officers and memorializes fallen officers by aligning Michigan with the national observance of Police Week. The practical impact is limited to official recognition by the Senate and public commemoration.

Impact

SR 47 has no direct legal effect on Michigan statutes, regulations, or agency operations. As a simple Senate resolution, it does not change state law, create enforceable rights, or require action by public bodies. Its impact is limited to ceremonial recognition of Police Week and public acknowledgment of law enforcement officers and those killed in the line of duty.

Sentiment

The sentiment around the resolution is strongly supportive and respectful. The text uses honorific language throughout, emphasizing gratitude, sacrifice, and public service, and the Senate adopted the resolution on May 14, 2025. No opposing votes or committee objections are provided in the available record, suggesting the measure was noncontroversial and broadly accepted as a tribute to law enforcement.

Contention

No substantive contention is evident in the bill text or available legislative history. Because the resolution is commemorative rather than regulatory, there is no apparent disagreement over policy implementation, funding, or legal change. Any potential debate would likely relate only to broader public views on policing, but no such objections, amendments, or dissent are shown in the provided materials.