Michigan Senate Bill SB0326

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/21/25
• Refer: 5/21/25

Caption

Labor: other; community and worker economic transition office; eliminate. Repeals 2023 PA 232 (MCL 408.911 - 408.919).

Summary

Senate Bill 326 would repeal 2023 PA 232, the Community and Worker Economic Transition Act. In practical terms, the bill eliminates the statutory framework created in 2023 for the Community and Worker Economic Transition Office and the related provisions in the Michigan Compiled Laws at MCL 408.911 to 408.919. Because the bill is a straightforward repeal, it does not create a new program or regulatory scheme. Instead, it removes the existing law governing the office and any duties, authorities, or procedures established under that act. The measure is focused on labor and economic transition policy, particularly state-level support structures tied to community and worker transition planning.

Impact

If enacted, SB 326 would strike the Community and Worker Economic Transition Act from Michigan law, thereby eliminating the statutory basis for the office and any associated responsibilities, reporting requirements, or administrative functions created by 2023 PA 232. This would affect the Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity or any other state entity tasked with implementing the act, as well as communities, workers, and stakeholders who may have relied on the office for transition-related assistance.

Sentiment

No committee transcripts or recorded votes were provided, so there is no direct evidence of debate or bipartisan support in the available record. Based on the bill text alone, the measure appears to reflect a repeal-oriented approach to labor policy rather than a consensus policy expansion. The available context suggests the bill is likely to be viewed through a partisan or policy-preference lens, but the specific level of support or opposition cannot be determined from the materials provided.

Contention

The main point of contention is the elimination of the Community and Worker Economic Transition Office and the broader policy choice to repeal a recently enacted worker-transition framework. Supporters of repeal would likely argue that the office is unnecessary, duplicative, or an improper use of state resources, while opponents would likely contend that it removes a tool intended to help workers and communities manage economic change. No specific arguments from legislators or stakeholders are included in the record provided.