Michigan Senate Bill SB0014

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/8/25
• Refer: 1/8/25

Caption

Education: athletics; admission fee for high school interscholastic athletic activities; allow for cash as accepted form of payment. Amends 1976 PA 451 (MCL 380.1 - 380.1852) by adding sec. 1290.

Summary

Senate Bill 14 would amend the Revised School Code to require public schools that charge admission for interscholastic athletic events at the high school level to accept cash as a payment option. The bill applies to school districts, intermediate school districts, and public school academies that operate a high school, and it defines “high school” as a school offering at least one of grades 9 through 12. In practical terms, the bill would prevent schools from using payment systems that exclude cash-only patrons for ticketed athletic events. It does not require schools to charge admission, but if they do, they must ensure cash is accepted for entry fees at those events.

Impact

The bill would add a new section 1290 to the Revised School Code, creating a specific statutory requirement for payment methods at high school interscholastic athletic events. It would affect public school districts, intermediate school districts, and public school academies by limiting their discretion over admission payment policies and requiring them to maintain cash acceptance alongside any electronic or card-based payment options.

Sentiment

No committee transcripts or recorded votes were provided, so there is no direct evidence of legislative debate or formal support/opposition in the available materials. Based on the bill text and caption, the measure appears straightforward and consumer-access oriented, aimed at preserving access for families who rely on cash. The available record does not show any amendments, committee action, or vote history indicating controversy or broad coalition support.

Contention

The main potential point of contention is whether schools should be required to maintain cash handling for event admissions when many venues are moving toward cashless systems for convenience, security, and administrative efficiency. Supporters would likely emphasize accessibility and fairness for cash-dependent families, while opponents or skeptics may argue that the mandate imposes operational burdens, slows entry, or conflicts with local control over school event management. No specific individuals or groups are identified in the provided record as taking these positions.