A resolution of tribute offered as a memorial for James McBryde, former member of the House of Representatives.
Summary
House Resolution 286 is a memorial tribute honoring James “Jim” McBryde, a former member of the Michigan House of Representatives. The resolution recounts his life and public service, including his work on the Isabella County Republican Executive Committee, Isabella County Commission, and later four terms in the state House representing the 99th District. It also highlights his education, family, community involvement, and later roles in economic development and state government.
The resolution does not create new policy, amend statutes, or appropriate funds. Its effect is ceremonial: it formally expresses the House’s condolences and appreciation for McBryde’s service, and directs that copies be sent to his family as a sign of respect. The bill’s practical impact is limited to the official legislative record and public recognition of his contributions to Michigan.
Impact
HR 286 has no direct effect on Michigan law, regulations, or state programs. It is a nonbinding commemorative resolution that serves to honor a deceased former legislator, preserve his legacy in the House journal, and transmit the chamber’s tribute to his family. No statutes are amended, no agencies are directed to act, and no legal rights or obligations are changed.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the resolution is uniformly positive and respectful. The text is written as an expression of gratitude and admiration for McBryde’s public service, leadership, and community involvement, and there is no indication of opposition or controversy. Because the available context includes no committee debate or recorded votes, the measure appears to have been treated as a routine memorial resolution with broad, uncontentious support.
Contention
There are no notable points of contention in the available record. The resolution is purely commemorative, and the context provided includes no committee transcripts, amendments, or roll-call votes suggesting disagreement. Any discussion would likely have focused on honoring McBryde’s career and contributions rather than on policy differences or legislative disputes.