A resolution of tribute offered as a memorial for Robert G. Bender, former member of the House of Representatives.
Summary
House Resolution 44 is a memorial tribute honoring Robert G. “Bob” Bender, a former member of the Michigan House of Representatives. The resolution recounts his life and public service, including his education at Michigan State University, service as a Navy pilot and captain, work as a dairy farmer, service on the Barry County Board of Commissioners, and 12 years in the state House representing Barry and Ionia counties. It also notes his post-legislative volunteer work with the Peace Corps in Russia and with From Houses to Homes in Guatemala.
The resolution does not create new policy, appropriate funds, or amend any statutes. Its legal effect is limited to expressing the House’s official condolences and respect, and directing that copies be transmitted to the Bender family. As a ceremonial resolution, it functions as a formal legislative acknowledgment of a former member’s contributions rather than a change to state law.
Impact
HR 44 has no regulatory or fiscal impact on Michigan law and does not affect any statutory rights, duties, or programs. Its only practical effect is ceremonial: it records the House’s tribute in the legislative journal and communicates the chamber’s esteem to the Bender family. The resolution may be relevant to legislative history and archival records, but it does not alter the responsibilities of any state agency, local government, or private party.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the resolution is uniformly respectful and positive. The text reflects admiration for Bender’s military service, agricultural background, legislative work, and later humanitarian volunteering, framing him as a dedicated public servant and community leader. Because the measure is a memorial resolution, there is no recorded opposition or divided vote, and the available context shows no committee controversy or debate.
Contention
There is no notable policy contention in the resolution itself, since it is a commemorative measure rather than substantive legislation. Any discussion would likely center only on the appropriateness of the tribute and the details of Bender’s service, but the provided record contains no committee transcripts, no recorded votes, and no evidence of disagreement. The measure appears to have been noncontroversial and unanimously respectful in nature.