Michigan House Bill HB5711

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/11/26
• Refer: 3/11/26
• Report Pass: 4/28/26

Caption

Energy: alternative sources; clean and renewable energy standards; eliminate. Amends title & secs. 1, 3, 7, 9, 11, 75, 77, 83, 87, 101, 173 & 191 of 2008 PA 295 (MCL 460.1001 et seq.) & repeals subpt. A of pt. 2 & sec. 179 of 2008 PA 295 (MCL 460.1022 - 460.1054 & 460.1179). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5710'26

Impact

The bill seeks to diversify the energy resources utilized in Michigan, aiming for greater energy security by leveraging in-state indigenous energy resources. By encouraging private investments in renewable energy and coordinating efforts with federal regulations, it also aims to improve air quality and provide more reliable energy supplies, particularly during extreme weather events. Additionally, the bill assigns specific responsibilities to the Michigan Public Service Commission for overseeing the implementation of these initiatives and ensuring compliance with outlined standards.

Summary

House Bill 5711 amends the Clean and Renewable Energy and Energy Waste Reduction Act in Michigan, focusing on new measures to enhance the state’s energy landscape. The bill requires electric and natural gas service providers to establish and recover costs for renewable energy and energy waste reduction programs, ensuring that any savings derived from these programs are returned to customers. A significant aspect of the bill includes the authorization for energy storage systems and customer generation programs, aimed at integrating distributed generation into the existing electric grid and promoting sustainable practices.

Contention

A point of contention surrounding HB 5711 lies in the balance between state regulatory powers and local control. While supporters argue that the amendment will streamline energy production and consumption processes, critics express concern that centralized control may limit local jurisdictions' abilities to address unique energy needs and priorities. Furthermore, the necessity of integrating various energy systems and the associated costs invite debate over economic implications for both service providers and consumers, particularly in the context of equity for lower-income households.