Law enforcement: other; certain federal agents to utilize body-worn cameras; require in certain circumstances. Creates new act.
Summary
House Bill 5662 would create a new Michigan act requiring U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents who are on duty in the state to use an activated body-worn camera during interactions with members of the public, unless the interaction occurs in a private place. The bill defines key terms such as “agent,” “body-worn camera,” and “private place,” and applies specifically to ICE agents rather than to state or local law enforcement officers generally.
The bill also establishes enforcement mechanisms. A violation of the camera requirement would be treated as a state civil infraction, punishable by a civil fine of up to $500. If the fine is not paid, the attorney general would be required to deem the individual ineligible to work in Michigan until the fine is satisfied. In effect, the bill seeks to impose a state-level compliance requirement and penalty structure on federal immigration agents operating within Michigan.
Impact
If enacted, the bill would add a new chapter of state law governing the conduct of ICE agents in Michigan and would create a state civil penalty for noncompliance. It would not regulate all law enforcement, but it would specifically target federal immigration agents when they are on duty in the state and interacting with the public. The bill would also give the attorney general a role in enforcing the penalty by barring unpaid violators from working in Michigan, which could affect federal operations and the presence of ICE personnel in the state.
Sentiment
No committee transcripts or recorded votes were provided, so there is no direct evidence of legislative debate or formal support/opposition in the available materials. Based on the bill text and caption, the measure appears designed to increase transparency and accountability in immigration enforcement encounters, which suggests a reform-oriented intent. At the same time, the absence of discussion records means the overall sentiment cannot be measured from the provided context.
Contention
The main point of contention is likely the bill’s attempt to impose state requirements and sanctions on federal ICE agents, including a state civil fine and a work-in-Michigan prohibition for unpaid fines. Supporters would likely view the measure as a transparency and civil-rights safeguard, while opponents may argue that it interferes with federal immigration enforcement or raises preemption and jurisdiction concerns. Another possible issue is the bill’s narrow scope: it applies only to ICE agents and only outside private places, which may prompt debate over whether the rule is sufficiently broad or practical.