Michigan House Bill HB5213

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/4/25
• Refer: 11/4/25

Caption

Family law: child custody; information on the presumption of equal or approximately equal parenting time; require the friend of the court to provide. Amends sec. 5 of 1982 PA 294 (MCL 552.505). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5211'25, HB 5212'25

Impact

The amendments laid out in HB 5213 are expected to facilitate a more informed process for couples undergoing domestic disputes, by mandating the distribution of an informational pamphlet that outlines the available resources, rights, and obligations of each party. This effort could lead to greater transparency about the roles of the court and the Friend of the Court in these sensitive matters, potentially improving cooperation between parents in matters of custody and support. By clarifying how to navigate these processes, the bill may also reduce the conflict during disputes and streamline some interactions with the court system.

Summary

House Bill 5213 proposes amendments to the Friend of the Court Act in Michigan, specifically targeting the responsibilities of the Friend of the Court offices in handling domestic relations cases. The bill aims to enhance communication regarding parental rights and responsibilities in child custody matters. Key provisions require the Friend of the Court to provide information to parties involved in domestic disputes about their rights concerning child support and parenting time, making it clear when they can opt out of enforcement processes unless mandated by the Title IV-D child support program.

Contention

While the bill appears to be beneficial in promoting better understanding among parents, there may be points of contention regarding its practical implementation. Critics could argue that simply providing information does not guarantee that parties will understand or utilize it, especially in contentious situations. Additionally, the effectiveness of the alternative dispute resolution procedures, which are also mentioned, remain a topic of discussion, as some parties may still prefer traditional courtroom proceedings over mediation. Furthermore, the requirement for certain documents and educational information to be shared may raise concerns about the burden it puts on the Friend of the Court's resources.