Michigan House Bill HB5142

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/28/25
• Refer: 10/28/25

Caption

Occupations: interior design; interior design license; provide for. Amends secs. 303a & 601 of 1980 PA 299 (MCL 339.303a & 339.601) & adds art. 20A. TIE BAR WITH: HB 5144'25, HB 5143'25

Impact

If enacted, HB 5142 will significantly impact the regulatory landscape for interior design in Michigan. It mandates that individuals wishing to practice interior design must obtain a license from the Department following a series of qualifications, including passing an examination and fulfilling educational criteria. This licensure will not only validate the professional qualifications of interior designers but is also likely to elevate the overall quality of work in the field by ensuring practitioners have met rigorous standards. The bill could lead to formal recognition of interior design as a regulated profession, akin to architecture and engineering.

Summary

House Bill 5142 proposes changes to the Occupational Code, specifically focusing on establishing regulations surrounding the licensure of interior designers in Michigan. The bill introduces provisions for a new licensing framework, which will be overseen by an appointed board tasked with implementing rules, maintaining a roster of licensed interior designers, and establishing continuing education requirements for license renewal. This legislation intends to standardize and professionalize the practice of interior design, ensuring that practitioners meet specific qualifications and adhere to existing safety and welfare standards.

Contention

The bill’s introduction may face contention from various stakeholders in the architectural and design community. Critics may argue that imposing licensure requirements could create barriers to entry for aspiring interior designers, particularly those who may have gained practical experience without formal education. Additionally, discussions may arise concerning the level of oversight the board should have, as well as the implications of requiring continuing education which may increase operational costs for interior designers. Balancing professional standards with accessibility is likely to be a significant point of debate as the bill progresses.